Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.

Eukaryotic gene expression is often under the control of cooperatively acting transcription factors whose binding is limited by structural constraints. By determining these structural constraints, we can understand the "rules" that define functional cooperativity. Conversely, by understand...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan K Shultzaberger, Derek Y Chiang, Alan M Moses, Michael B Eisen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2007-11-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2077805?pdf=render
id doaj-1035658be2694b85813dedd68931bfec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1035658be2694b85813dedd68931bfec2020-11-24T22:16:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032007-11-01211e119910.1371/journal.pone.0001199Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.Ryan K ShultzabergerDerek Y ChiangAlan M MosesMichael B EisenEukaryotic gene expression is often under the control of cooperatively acting transcription factors whose binding is limited by structural constraints. By determining these structural constraints, we can understand the "rules" that define functional cooperativity. Conversely, by understanding the rules of binding, we can infer structural characteristics. We have developed an information theory based method for approximating the physical limitations of cooperative interactions by comparing sequence analysis to microarray expression data. When applied to the coordinated binding of the sulfur amino acid regulatory protein Met4 by Cbf1 and Met31, we were able to create a combinatorial model that can correctly identify Met4 regulated genes. Interestingly, we found that the major determinant of Met4 regulation was the sum of the strength of the Cbf1 and Met31 binding sites and that the energetic costs associated with spacing appeared to be minimal.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2077805?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ryan K Shultzaberger
Derek Y Chiang
Alan M Moses
Michael B Eisen
spellingShingle Ryan K Shultzaberger
Derek Y Chiang
Alan M Moses
Michael B Eisen
Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Ryan K Shultzaberger
Derek Y Chiang
Alan M Moses
Michael B Eisen
author_sort Ryan K Shultzaberger
title Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.
title_short Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.
title_full Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.
title_fullStr Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using DNA sequence analysis.
title_sort determining physical constraints in transcriptional initiation complexes using dna sequence analysis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2007-11-01
description Eukaryotic gene expression is often under the control of cooperatively acting transcription factors whose binding is limited by structural constraints. By determining these structural constraints, we can understand the "rules" that define functional cooperativity. Conversely, by understanding the rules of binding, we can infer structural characteristics. We have developed an information theory based method for approximating the physical limitations of cooperative interactions by comparing sequence analysis to microarray expression data. When applied to the coordinated binding of the sulfur amino acid regulatory protein Met4 by Cbf1 and Met31, we were able to create a combinatorial model that can correctly identify Met4 regulated genes. Interestingly, we found that the major determinant of Met4 regulation was the sum of the strength of the Cbf1 and Met31 binding sites and that the energetic costs associated with spacing appeared to be minimal.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2077805?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ryankshultzaberger determiningphysicalconstraintsintranscriptionalinitiationcomplexesusingdnasequenceanalysis
AT derekychiang determiningphysicalconstraintsintranscriptionalinitiationcomplexesusingdnasequenceanalysis
AT alanmmoses determiningphysicalconstraintsintranscriptionalinitiationcomplexesusingdnasequenceanalysis
AT michaelbeisen determiningphysicalconstraintsintranscriptionalinitiationcomplexesusingdnasequenceanalysis
_version_ 1725789042246680576