Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts

Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Jamieson, Tony Wall, Neil Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Brookes University 2020-06-01
Series:International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
Subjects:
Online Access:https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/e37aafe8-1978-4758-974b-2b25d05d52a3/1/2020_S14_01.pdf
id doaj-0e418d6bd58946c7b3a689ad740a9fcf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0e418d6bd58946c7b3a689ad740a9fcf2020-11-25T02:39:56ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring1741-83051741-83052020-06-01S1431810.24384/prb0-s320Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching CountsMark Jamieson0Tony Wall1Neil Moore2University of ChesterInternational Centre for ThrivingUniversity of ChesterEvidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/e37aafe8-1978-4758-974b-2b25d05d52a3/1/2020_S14_01.pdfleadership coachingevaluationambidexteritymoderators
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Jamieson
Tony Wall
Neil Moore
spellingShingle Mark Jamieson
Tony Wall
Neil Moore
Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
leadership coaching
evaluation
ambidexterity
moderators
author_facet Mark Jamieson
Tony Wall
Neil Moore
author_sort Mark Jamieson
title Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
title_short Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
title_full Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
title_fullStr Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
title_full_unstemmed Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
title_sort why evaluation of leadership coaching counts
publisher Oxford Brookes University
series International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring
issn 1741-8305
1741-8305
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.
topic leadership coaching
evaluation
ambidexterity
moderators
url https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/e37aafe8-1978-4758-974b-2b25d05d52a3/1/2020_S14_01.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT markjamieson whyevaluationofleadershipcoachingcounts
AT tonywall whyevaluationofleadershipcoachingcounts
AT neilmoore whyevaluationofleadershipcoachingcounts
_version_ 1724783868195635200