Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts
Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford Brookes University
2020-06-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/e37aafe8-1978-4758-974b-2b25d05d52a3/1/2020_S14_01.pdf |
id |
doaj-0e418d6bd58946c7b3a689ad740a9fcf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0e418d6bd58946c7b3a689ad740a9fcf2020-11-25T02:39:56ZengOxford Brookes UniversityInternational Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring1741-83051741-83052020-06-01S1431810.24384/prb0-s320Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching CountsMark Jamieson0Tony Wall1Neil Moore2University of ChesterInternational Centre for ThrivingUniversity of ChesterEvidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution.https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/e37aafe8-1978-4758-974b-2b25d05d52a3/1/2020_S14_01.pdfleadership coachingevaluationambidexteritymoderators |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mark Jamieson Tony Wall Neil Moore |
spellingShingle |
Mark Jamieson Tony Wall Neil Moore Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring leadership coaching evaluation ambidexterity moderators |
author_facet |
Mark Jamieson Tony Wall Neil Moore |
author_sort |
Mark Jamieson |
title |
Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts |
title_short |
Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts |
title_full |
Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts |
title_fullStr |
Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Evaluation of Leadership Coaching Counts |
title_sort |
why evaluation of leadership coaching counts |
publisher |
Oxford Brookes University |
series |
International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring |
issn |
1741-8305 1741-8305 |
publishDate |
2020-06-01 |
description |
Evidence suggests organisations’ significant investment in leadership coaching is characterised by two evaluation paradoxes: despite high strategic expectations and substantial budgets, evaluation has low strategic status; and, where organisations do attempt to evaluate, focus contradicts espoused overarching leadership outcomes. In response to criticism that research methodologies fail to replicate complex leadership environments, this study adopts ambidexterity to produce new moderators to explore the contradictory environment for evaluation and potential for a wider strategic contribution. |
topic |
leadership coaching evaluation ambidexterity moderators |
url |
https://radar.brookes.ac.uk/radar/items/e37aafe8-1978-4758-974b-2b25d05d52a3/1/2020_S14_01.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT markjamieson whyevaluationofleadershipcoachingcounts AT tonywall whyevaluationofleadershipcoachingcounts AT neilmoore whyevaluationofleadershipcoachingcounts |
_version_ |
1724783868195635200 |