Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy

This paper is part of a larger project designed to examine and ameliorate the underrepresentation of female-identified students in the philosophy department at Elon University. The larger project involved a variety of research methods, including statistical analysis of extant registration and grade...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claire A Lockard, Helen Meskhidze, Sean Wilson, Nim Batchelor, Stephen Bloch-Schulman, Ann J Cahill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Western Ontario 2017-12-01
Series:Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
Online Access:https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/3107
id doaj-0dad11eacc5a48d288cb490e9b932391
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0dad11eacc5a48d288cb490e9b9323912021-09-10T21:59:29ZengUniversity of Western OntarioFeminist Philosophy Quarterly2371-25702017-12-013410.5206/fpq/2017.4.4Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in PhilosophyClaire A Lockard0Helen Meskhidze1Sean Wilson2Nim Batchelor3Stephen Bloch-Schulman4Ann J Cahill5Elon UniversityElon UniversityElon UniversityElon UniversityElon UniversityElon University This paper is part of a larger project designed to examine and ameliorate the underrepresentation of female-identified students in the philosophy department at Elon University. The larger project involved a variety of research methods, including statistical analysis of extant registration and grade distribution data from our department as well as the administration of multiple surveys. Here, we provide a description and analysis of one aspect of our research: focus groups. We ran three focus groups of female-identified undergraduate students: one group consisted of students who had taken more than one philosophy class, one consisted of students who had taken only one philosophy class, and one consisted of students who had taken no philosophy classes. After analyzing the results of the focus groups, we find evidence that: (1) one philosophy class alone did not cultivate a growth mindset among female-identified students of philosophy, (2) professors have the potential to ameliorate (or reinforce) students’ (mis)perceptions of philosophy; and (3) students who have not taken philosophy are likely to see their manner of thinking as being at odds with that required by philosophy. We conclude by articulating a series of questions worthy of further study. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/3107
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Claire A Lockard
Helen Meskhidze
Sean Wilson
Nim Batchelor
Stephen Bloch-Schulman
Ann J Cahill
spellingShingle Claire A Lockard
Helen Meskhidze
Sean Wilson
Nim Batchelor
Stephen Bloch-Schulman
Ann J Cahill
Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy
Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
author_facet Claire A Lockard
Helen Meskhidze
Sean Wilson
Nim Batchelor
Stephen Bloch-Schulman
Ann J Cahill
author_sort Claire A Lockard
title Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy
title_short Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy
title_full Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy
title_fullStr Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Using Focus Groups to Explore the Underrepresentation of Female-Identified Undergraduate Students in Philosophy
title_sort using focus groups to explore the underrepresentation of female-identified undergraduate students in philosophy
publisher University of Western Ontario
series Feminist Philosophy Quarterly
issn 2371-2570
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This paper is part of a larger project designed to examine and ameliorate the underrepresentation of female-identified students in the philosophy department at Elon University. The larger project involved a variety of research methods, including statistical analysis of extant registration and grade distribution data from our department as well as the administration of multiple surveys. Here, we provide a description and analysis of one aspect of our research: focus groups. We ran three focus groups of female-identified undergraduate students: one group consisted of students who had taken more than one philosophy class, one consisted of students who had taken only one philosophy class, and one consisted of students who had taken no philosophy classes. After analyzing the results of the focus groups, we find evidence that: (1) one philosophy class alone did not cultivate a growth mindset among female-identified students of philosophy, (2) professors have the potential to ameliorate (or reinforce) students’ (mis)perceptions of philosophy; and (3) students who have not taken philosophy are likely to see their manner of thinking as being at odds with that required by philosophy. We conclude by articulating a series of questions worthy of further study.
url https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/fpq/article/view/3107
work_keys_str_mv AT clairealockard usingfocusgroupstoexploretheunderrepresentationoffemaleidentifiedundergraduatestudentsinphilosophy
AT helenmeskhidze usingfocusgroupstoexploretheunderrepresentationoffemaleidentifiedundergraduatestudentsinphilosophy
AT seanwilson usingfocusgroupstoexploretheunderrepresentationoffemaleidentifiedundergraduatestudentsinphilosophy
AT nimbatchelor usingfocusgroupstoexploretheunderrepresentationoffemaleidentifiedundergraduatestudentsinphilosophy
AT stephenblochschulman usingfocusgroupstoexploretheunderrepresentationoffemaleidentifiedundergraduatestudentsinphilosophy
AT annjcahill usingfocusgroupstoexploretheunderrepresentationoffemaleidentifiedundergraduatestudentsinphilosophy
_version_ 1717757467949006848