Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; text-align: justify;">Honey is a valuable food for its beneficial nutritional and dietetic effects. The quality of honey fluctuates considerably according to var...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
HACCP Consulting
|
Series: | Potravinarstvo |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/909 |
id |
doaj-0bcd6ce06a314c6887651e2a22c170b2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0bcd6ce06a314c6887651e2a22c170b22020-11-24T23:57:48ZengHACCP ConsultingPotravinarstvo 1337-096012136437110.5219/909672Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chainMilena Bušová0Lenka Kouřimská1Charles University in Prague First faculty of Medicine, Institut of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Studničkova 7, Praha 2Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha 6 – Suchdol<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; text-align: justify;">Honey is a valuable food for its beneficial nutritional and dietetic effects. The quality of honey fluctuates considerably according to various criteria, the adulteration of honey with cheaper substitutes is not negligible. The quality of honey in the market chain with honey taken from beekeepers was compared in this study. A total of 10 samples from each group were tested for basic qualitative markers and compared with legislative criteria. The samples were analysed for fructose and glucose content, water content, titratable acidity and two tests for illegal sugar additions. The results revealed the addition of 25% of the technical syrup in one sample of honey from the market chain, one sample had the sum of fructose and glucose 56,3%, it is below the required limit 60% (differed by 6,3%). In other parameters the samples complied with the valid legislation. All tested parameters in honey from beekeepers met the criteria of the legislation, only 1 sample of blossom honey had the sum of fructose and glucose just below the required limit. The sum of fructose and glucose in this sample was 58.3 %, it differed by 2.9% from the required content of 60%. Sensory analysis was used to assess four samples of honey from beekeepers collected by different techniques. Results have not shown significant difference in sensory properties between manually pressed honey and honey obtained after whirling. The responses characterizing the favourable sensory properties of the examined honey samples were prevailing. The difference between the perception of honey after whirling and honey harvested by press manually was not demonstrated in sensory properties.</p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/909blossom honeyhoneydew honeyadulterationbeekeepermarket chain |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Milena Bušová Lenka Kouřimská |
spellingShingle |
Milena Bušová Lenka Kouřimská Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain Potravinarstvo blossom honey honeydew honey adulteration beekeeper market chain |
author_facet |
Milena Bušová Lenka Kouřimská |
author_sort |
Milena Bušová |
title |
Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain |
title_short |
Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain |
title_full |
Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain |
title_fullStr |
Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain |
title_sort |
comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain |
publisher |
HACCP Consulting |
series |
Potravinarstvo |
issn |
1337-0960 |
description |
<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; text-align: justify;">Honey is a valuable food for its beneficial nutritional and dietetic effects. The quality of honey fluctuates considerably according to various criteria, the adulteration of honey with cheaper substitutes is not negligible. The quality of honey in the market chain with honey taken from beekeepers was compared in this study. A total of 10 samples from each group were tested for basic qualitative markers and compared with legislative criteria. The samples were analysed for fructose and glucose content, water content, titratable acidity and two tests for illegal sugar additions. The results revealed the addition of 25% of the technical syrup in one sample of honey from the market chain, one sample had the sum of fructose and glucose 56,3%, it is below the required limit 60% (differed by 6,3%). In other parameters the samples complied with the valid legislation. All tested parameters in honey from beekeepers met the criteria of the legislation, only 1 sample of blossom honey had the sum of fructose and glucose just below the required limit. The sum of fructose and glucose in this sample was 58.3 %, it differed by 2.9% from the required content of 60%. Sensory analysis was used to assess four samples of honey from beekeepers collected by different techniques. Results have not shown significant difference in sensory properties between manually pressed honey and honey obtained after whirling. The responses characterizing the favourable sensory properties of the examined honey samples were prevailing. The difference between the perception of honey after whirling and honey harvested by press manually was not demonstrated in sensory properties.</p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span> |
topic |
blossom honey honeydew honey adulteration beekeeper market chain |
url |
http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/909 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT milenabusova comparingthequalityofhoneyfrombeekeepersandhoneyfromthemarketchain AT lenkakourimska comparingthequalityofhoneyfrombeekeepersandhoneyfromthemarketchain |
_version_ |
1725453214069817344 |