Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain

<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; text-align: justify;">Honey is a valuable food for its beneficial nutritional and dietetic effects. The quality of honey fluctuates considerably according to var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milena Bušová, Lenka Kouřimská
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: HACCP Consulting
Series:Potravinarstvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/909
id doaj-0bcd6ce06a314c6887651e2a22c170b2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bcd6ce06a314c6887651e2a22c170b22020-11-24T23:57:48ZengHACCP ConsultingPotravinarstvo 1337-096012136437110.5219/909672Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chainMilena Bušová0Lenka Kouřimská1Charles University in Prague First faculty of Medicine, Institut of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Studničkova 7, Praha 2Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha 6 – Suchdol<span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; text-align: justify;">Honey is a valuable food for its beneficial nutritional and dietetic effects. The quality of honey fluctuates considerably according to various criteria, the adulteration of honey with cheaper substitutes is not negligible. The quality of honey in the market chain with honey taken from beekeepers was compared in this study. A total of 10 samples from each group were tested for basic qualitative markers and compared with legislative criteria. The samples were analysed for fructose and glucose content, water content, titratable acidity and two tests for illegal sugar additions. The results revealed the addition of 25% of the technical syrup in one sample of honey from the market chain, one sample had the sum of fructose and glucose 56,3%, it is below the required limit 60% (differed by 6,3%). In other parameters the samples complied with the valid legislation. All tested parameters in honey from beekeepers met the criteria of the legislation, only 1 sample of blossom honey had the sum of fructose and glucose just below the required limit. The sum of fructose and glucose in this sample was 58.3 %, it differed by 2.9% from the required content of 60%. Sensory analysis was used to assess four samples of honey from beekeepers collected by different techniques. Results have not shown significant difference in sensory properties between manually pressed honey and honey obtained after whirling. The responses characterizing the favourable sensory properties of the examined honey samples were prevailing. The difference between the perception of honey after whirling and honey harvested by press manually was not demonstrated in sensory properties.</p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/909blossom honeyhoneydew honeyadulterationbeekeepermarket chain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milena Bušová
Lenka Kouřimská
spellingShingle Milena Bušová
Lenka Kouřimská
Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
Potravinarstvo
blossom honey
honeydew honey
adulteration
beekeeper
market chain
author_facet Milena Bušová
Lenka Kouřimská
author_sort Milena Bušová
title Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
title_short Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
title_full Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
title_fullStr Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
title_sort comparing the quality of honey from beekeepers and honey from the market chain
publisher HACCP Consulting
series Potravinarstvo
issn 1337-0960
description <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; text-align: justify;">Honey is a valuable food for its beneficial nutritional and dietetic effects. The quality of honey fluctuates considerably according to various criteria, the adulteration of honey with cheaper substitutes is not negligible. The quality of honey in the market chain with honey taken from beekeepers was compared in this study. A total of 10 samples from each group were tested for basic qualitative markers and compared with legislative criteria. The samples were analysed for fructose and glucose content, water content, titratable acidity and two tests for illegal sugar additions. The results revealed the addition of 25% of the technical syrup in one sample of honey from the market chain, one sample had the sum of fructose and glucose 56,3%, it is below the required limit 60% (differed by 6,3%). In other parameters the samples complied with the valid legislation. All tested parameters in honey from beekeepers met the criteria of the legislation, only 1 sample of blossom honey had the sum of fructose and glucose just below the required limit. The sum of fructose and glucose in this sample was 58.3 %, it differed by 2.9% from the required content of 60%. Sensory analysis was used to assess four samples of honey from beekeepers collected by different techniques. Results have not shown significant difference in sensory properties between manually pressed honey and honey obtained after whirling. The responses characterizing the favourable sensory properties of the examined honey samples were prevailing. The difference between the perception of honey after whirling and honey harvested by press manually was not demonstrated in sensory properties.</p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"> </span>
topic blossom honey
honeydew honey
adulteration
beekeeper
market chain
url http://www.potravinarstvo.com/journal1/index.php/potravinarstvo/article/view/909
work_keys_str_mv AT milenabusova comparingthequalityofhoneyfrombeekeepersandhoneyfromthemarketchain
AT lenkakourimska comparingthequalityofhoneyfrombeekeepersandhoneyfromthemarketchain
_version_ 1725453214069817344