Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Senescent cells are well-recognized in the aging/degenerating human disc. Senescent cells are viable, cannot divide, remain metabolically active and accumulate within the disc over time. Molecular analysis of senescent cells in tissu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ingram Jane A, Hoelscher Gretchen L, Gruber Helen E, Zinchenko Natalia, Hanley Edward N
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-01-01
Series:BMC Biotechnology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/10/5
id doaj-0bc699b8b4b34ecdac419123124856ab
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bc699b8b4b34ecdac419123124856ab2020-11-25T03:57:33ZengBMCBMC Biotechnology1472-67502010-01-01101510.1186/1472-6750-10-5Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysisIngram Jane AHoelscher Gretchen LGruber Helen EZinchenko NataliaHanley Edward N<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Senescent cells are well-recognized in the aging/degenerating human disc. Senescent cells are viable, cannot divide, remain metabolically active and accumulate within the disc over time. Molecular analysis of senescent cells in tissue offers a special challenge since there are no cell surface markers for senescence which would let one use fluorescence-activated cell sorting as a method for separating out senescent cells.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We employed a novel laser capture microdissection (LCM) design to selectively harvest senescent and non-senescent annulus cells in paraffin-embedded tissue, and compared their gene expression with microarray analysis. LCM was used to separately harvest senescent and non-senescent cells from 11 human annulus specimens.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Microarray analysis revealed significant differences in expression levels in senescent cells vs non-senescent cells: 292 genes were upregulated, and 321 downregulated. Genes with established relationships to senescence were found to be significantly upregulated in senescent cells vs. non-senescent cells: p38 (MPAK14), RB-Associated KRAB zinc finger, Discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain, growth arrest and DNA-damage inducible beta, p28ING5, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 and somatostatin receptor 3; cyclin-dependent kinase 8 showed significant downregulation in senescent cells. Nitric oxidase synthase 1, and heat shock 70 kDa protein 6, both of which were significantly down-regulated in senescent cells, also showed significant changes. Additional genes related to cytokines, cell proliferation, and other processes were also identified.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our LCM-microarray analyses identified a set of genes associated with senescence which were significantly upregulated in senescent vs non-senescent cells in the human annulus. These genes include p38 MAP kinase, discoidin, inhibitor of growth family member 5, and growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible beta. Other genes, including genes associated with cell proliferation, extracellular matrix formation, cell signaling and other cell functions also showed significant modulation in senescent vs non-senescent cells. The aging/degenerating disc undergoes a well-recognized loss of cells; understanding senescent cells is important since their presence further reduces the disc's ability to generate new cells to replace those lost to necrosis or apoptosis.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/10/5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ingram Jane A
Hoelscher Gretchen L
Gruber Helen E
Zinchenko Natalia
Hanley Edward N
spellingShingle Ingram Jane A
Hoelscher Gretchen L
Gruber Helen E
Zinchenko Natalia
Hanley Edward N
Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
BMC Biotechnology
author_facet Ingram Jane A
Hoelscher Gretchen L
Gruber Helen E
Zinchenko Natalia
Hanley Edward N
author_sort Ingram Jane A
title Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
title_short Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
title_full Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
title_fullStr Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
title_full_unstemmed Senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: Cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
title_sort senescent vs. non-senescent cells in the human annulus in vivo: cell harvest with laser capture microdissection and gene expression studies with microarray analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Biotechnology
issn 1472-6750
publishDate 2010-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Senescent cells are well-recognized in the aging/degenerating human disc. Senescent cells are viable, cannot divide, remain metabolically active and accumulate within the disc over time. Molecular analysis of senescent cells in tissue offers a special challenge since there are no cell surface markers for senescence which would let one use fluorescence-activated cell sorting as a method for separating out senescent cells.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We employed a novel laser capture microdissection (LCM) design to selectively harvest senescent and non-senescent annulus cells in paraffin-embedded tissue, and compared their gene expression with microarray analysis. LCM was used to separately harvest senescent and non-senescent cells from 11 human annulus specimens.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Microarray analysis revealed significant differences in expression levels in senescent cells vs non-senescent cells: 292 genes were upregulated, and 321 downregulated. Genes with established relationships to senescence were found to be significantly upregulated in senescent cells vs. non-senescent cells: p38 (MPAK14), RB-Associated KRAB zinc finger, Discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain, growth arrest and DNA-damage inducible beta, p28ING5, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 and somatostatin receptor 3; cyclin-dependent kinase 8 showed significant downregulation in senescent cells. Nitric oxidase synthase 1, and heat shock 70 kDa protein 6, both of which were significantly down-regulated in senescent cells, also showed significant changes. Additional genes related to cytokines, cell proliferation, and other processes were also identified.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our LCM-microarray analyses identified a set of genes associated with senescence which were significantly upregulated in senescent vs non-senescent cells in the human annulus. These genes include p38 MAP kinase, discoidin, inhibitor of growth family member 5, and growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible beta. Other genes, including genes associated with cell proliferation, extracellular matrix formation, cell signaling and other cell functions also showed significant modulation in senescent vs non-senescent cells. The aging/degenerating disc undergoes a well-recognized loss of cells; understanding senescent cells is important since their presence further reduces the disc's ability to generate new cells to replace those lost to necrosis or apoptosis.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6750/10/5
work_keys_str_mv AT ingramjanea senescentvsnonsenescentcellsinthehumanannulusinvivocellharvestwithlasercapturemicrodissectionandgeneexpressionstudieswithmicroarrayanalysis
AT hoelschergretchenl senescentvsnonsenescentcellsinthehumanannulusinvivocellharvestwithlasercapturemicrodissectionandgeneexpressionstudieswithmicroarrayanalysis
AT gruberhelene senescentvsnonsenescentcellsinthehumanannulusinvivocellharvestwithlasercapturemicrodissectionandgeneexpressionstudieswithmicroarrayanalysis
AT zinchenkonatalia senescentvsnonsenescentcellsinthehumanannulusinvivocellharvestwithlasercapturemicrodissectionandgeneexpressionstudieswithmicroarrayanalysis
AT hanleyedwardn senescentvsnonsenescentcellsinthehumanannulusinvivocellharvestwithlasercapturemicrodissectionandgeneexpressionstudieswithmicroarrayanalysis
_version_ 1724460122030211072