The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.

In fast-growing microorganisms, a tRNA concentration profile enriched in major isoacceptors selects for the biased usage of cognate codons. This optimizes translational rate for the least mass invested in the translational apparatus. Such translational streamlining is thought to be growth-regulated,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2005-06-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010012
id doaj-08b992ab0c1c48108b1c0934a60cc772
record_format Article
spelling doaj-08b992ab0c1c48108b1c0934a60cc7722020-11-24T23:06:39ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582005-06-0111e12The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.In fast-growing microorganisms, a tRNA concentration profile enriched in major isoacceptors selects for the biased usage of cognate codons. This optimizes translational rate for the least mass invested in the translational apparatus. Such translational streamlining is thought to be growth-regulated, but its genetic basis is poorly understood. First, we found in reanalysis of the E. coli tRNA profile that the degree to which it is translationally streamlined is nearly invariant with growth rate. Then, using least squares multiple regression, we partitioned tRNA isoacceptor pools to predicted tDNA operons from the E. coli K12 genome. Co-expression of tDNAs in operons explains the tRNA profile significantly better than tDNA gene dosage alone. Also, operon expression increases significantly with proximity to the origin of replication, oriC, at all growth rates. Genome location explains about 15% of expression variation in a form, at a given growth rate, that is consistent with replication-dependent gene concentration effects. Yet the change in the tRNA profile with growth rate is less than would be expected from such effects. We estimated per-copy expression rates for all tDNA operons that were consistent with independent estimates for rDNA operons. We also found that tDNA operon location, and the location dependence of expression, were significantly different in the leading and lagging strands. The operonic organization and genomic location of tDNA operons are significant factors influencing their expression. Nonrandom patterns of location and strandedness shown by tDNA operons in E. coli suggest that their genomic architecture may be under selection to satisfy physiological demand for tRNA expression at high growth rates.http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010012
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.
spellingShingle The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.
PLoS Computational Biology
title_short The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.
title_full The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.
title_fullStr The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.
title_full_unstemmed The Genomic Pattern of tDNA Operon Expression in E. coli.
title_sort genomic pattern of tdna operon expression in e. coli.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Computational Biology
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
publishDate 2005-06-01
description In fast-growing microorganisms, a tRNA concentration profile enriched in major isoacceptors selects for the biased usage of cognate codons. This optimizes translational rate for the least mass invested in the translational apparatus. Such translational streamlining is thought to be growth-regulated, but its genetic basis is poorly understood. First, we found in reanalysis of the E. coli tRNA profile that the degree to which it is translationally streamlined is nearly invariant with growth rate. Then, using least squares multiple regression, we partitioned tRNA isoacceptor pools to predicted tDNA operons from the E. coli K12 genome. Co-expression of tDNAs in operons explains the tRNA profile significantly better than tDNA gene dosage alone. Also, operon expression increases significantly with proximity to the origin of replication, oriC, at all growth rates. Genome location explains about 15% of expression variation in a form, at a given growth rate, that is consistent with replication-dependent gene concentration effects. Yet the change in the tRNA profile with growth rate is less than would be expected from such effects. We estimated per-copy expression rates for all tDNA operons that were consistent with independent estimates for rDNA operons. We also found that tDNA operon location, and the location dependence of expression, were significantly different in the leading and lagging strands. The operonic organization and genomic location of tDNA operons are significant factors influencing their expression. Nonrandom patterns of location and strandedness shown by tDNA operons in E. coli suggest that their genomic architecture may be under selection to satisfy physiological demand for tRNA expression at high growth rates.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010012
_version_ 1725621929305440256