Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Helle Katrine Knutsen, Jan Alexander, Lars Barregård, Margherita Bignami, Beat Brüschweiler, Sandra Ceccatelli, Bruce Cottrill, Michael Dinovi, Lutz Edler, Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp, Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom, Carlo Stefano Nebbia, Isabelle P. Oswald, Annette Petersen, Martin Rose, Alain‐Claude Roudot, Tanja Schwerdtle, Christiane Vleminckx, Günter Vollmer, Heather Wallace, Anne‐Katrine Lundebye, Manfred Metzler, Paolo Colombo, Christer Hogstrand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961
id doaj-0780b7b30dff4cd081f28b80eea19864
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0780b7b30dff4cd081f28b80eea198642021-09-09T18:10:49ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322017-07-01157n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbonEFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)Helle Katrine KnutsenJan AlexanderLars BarregårdMargherita BignamiBeat BrüschweilerSandra CeccatelliBruce CottrillMichael DinoviLutz EdlerBettina Grasl‐KrauppLaurentius (Ron) HoogenboomCarlo Stefano NebbiaIsabelle P. OswaldAnnette PetersenMartin RoseAlain‐Claude RoudotTanja SchwerdtleChristiane VleminckxGünter VollmerHeather WallaceAnne‐Katrine LundebyeManfred MetzlerPaolo ColomboChrister HogstrandAbstract Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin‐like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL‐PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. As described in scientific literature, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (84%) and DL‐PCBs (55%), and therefore, it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, assuming that the level of contamination of untreated fish oil was within the range of the tested batches. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the use of activated carbon adsorption does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil; however, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL‐PCBs from the fish oil by means of physical filtration with activated carbon, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961decontamination processfeeddioxinsPCDD/Fsdioxin‐like PCBsfish oil
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Jan Alexander
Lars Barregård
Margherita Bignami
Beat Brüschweiler
Sandra Ceccatelli
Bruce Cottrill
Michael Dinovi
Lutz Edler
Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Isabelle P. Oswald
Annette Petersen
Martin Rose
Alain‐Claude Roudot
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Günter Vollmer
Heather Wallace
Anne‐Katrine Lundebye
Manfred Metzler
Paolo Colombo
Christer Hogstrand
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Jan Alexander
Lars Barregård
Margherita Bignami
Beat Brüschweiler
Sandra Ceccatelli
Bruce Cottrill
Michael Dinovi
Lutz Edler
Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Isabelle P. Oswald
Annette Petersen
Martin Rose
Alain‐Claude Roudot
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Günter Vollmer
Heather Wallace
Anne‐Katrine Lundebye
Manfred Metzler
Paolo Colombo
Christer Hogstrand
Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
EFSA Journal
decontamination process
feed
dioxins
PCDD/Fs
dioxin‐like PCBs
fish oil
author_facet EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
Helle Katrine Knutsen
Jan Alexander
Lars Barregård
Margherita Bignami
Beat Brüschweiler
Sandra Ceccatelli
Bruce Cottrill
Michael Dinovi
Lutz Edler
Bettina Grasl‐Kraupp
Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom
Carlo Stefano Nebbia
Isabelle P. Oswald
Annette Petersen
Martin Rose
Alain‐Claude Roudot
Tanja Schwerdtle
Christiane Vleminckx
Günter Vollmer
Heather Wallace
Anne‐Katrine Lundebye
Manfred Metzler
Paolo Colombo
Christer Hogstrand
author_sort EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM)
title Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
title_short Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
title_full Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
title_fullStr Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like PCBs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
title_sort assessment of a decontamination process for dioxins and dioxin‐like pcbs in fish oil by physical filtration with activated carbon
publisher Wiley
series EFSA Journal
issn 1831-4732
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM) provided a scientific opinion on the assessment of a decontamination process consisting in the adsorption with activated carbon and physical filtration of fish oil in order to reduce the amount of dioxins (polychlorinated dibenzo‐p‐dioxins (PCDDs) and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs)) and dioxin‐like polychlorinated biphenyls (DL‐PCBs). All feed decontamination processes must comply with the acceptability criteria specified in the Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786. The data provided by the feed business operator were assessed with respect to the efficacy of the process and on information demonstrating that the process does not adversely affect the characteristics and the nature of the product. As described in scientific literature, the process was effective in removing PCDD/Fs (84%) and DL‐PCBs (55%), and therefore, it is possible to meet the current EU requirements with respect to these contaminants, assuming that the level of contamination of untreated fish oil was within the range of the tested batches. The Panel considered that the reference to information available in published literature was a pragmatic approach to demonstrate that the use of activated carbon adsorption does not lead to any detrimental changes in the nature of the fish oil; however, it was noted that the process could deplete some beneficial constituents (e.g. vitamins). Information was provided to demonstrate the safe disposal of the waste material. The CONTAM Panel concluded that on the basis of the information submitted by the feed business operator the proposed decontamination process to remove dioxins (PCDD/Fs) and DL‐PCBs from the fish oil by means of physical filtration with activated carbon, was compliant with the acceptability criteria provided for in Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/786 of 19 May 2015.
topic decontamination process
feed
dioxins
PCDD/Fs
dioxin‐like PCBs
fish oil
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4961
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapaneloncontaminantsinthefoodchaincontam assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT hellekatrineknutsen assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT janalexander assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT larsbarregard assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT margheritabignami assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT beatbruschweiler assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT sandraceccatelli assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT brucecottrill assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT michaeldinovi assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT lutzedler assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT bettinagraslkraupp assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT laurentiusronhoogenboom assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT carlostefanonebbia assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT isabelleposwald assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT annettepetersen assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT martinrose assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT alainclauderoudot assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT tanjaschwerdtle assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT christianevleminckx assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT guntervollmer assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT heatherwallace assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT annekatrinelundebye assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT manfredmetzler assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT paolocolombo assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
AT christerhogstrand assessmentofadecontaminationprocessfordioxinsanddioxinlikepcbsinfishoilbyphysicalfiltrationwithactivatedcarbon
_version_ 1717758915058335744