Pulse Compressed Time Domain Multiplexed Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor: A Comparative Study

This paper experimentally demonstrates the feasibility of improving the sensing performance of fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-based point sensors by deploying two pulse coding techniques, simplex coding (SSC), and Golay complementary codes (GCC). The two techniques are separately combined with the conven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arsad, N (Author), Azeman, NH (Author), Bakar, AAA (Author), Elgaud, MM (Author), Ghaith, AA (Author), Mokhtar, MHH (Author), Naim, NF (Author), Zan, MSD (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
SSC
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
Description
Summary:This paper experimentally demonstrates the feasibility of improving the sensing performance of fiber Bragg grating (FBG)-based point sensors by deploying two pulse coding techniques, simplex coding (SSC), and Golay complementary codes (GCC). The two techniques are separately combined with the conventional time-domain multiplexed FBG (TDM-FBG) interrogation sensor, and their results are compared with respect to the conventional single pulse interrogation technique. Consistently with the theory, for both the coding techniques, we have confirmed that the signal-to-noise ratio improved proportionally to the code length. In details, for both the techniques, the signal-to-noise improvement ratio of two FBGs located after around 16.35 km of fiber has significantly increased up to about 6 dB. Furthermore, the decoded signals from both techniques conserve their original spatial properties, confirming the successfulness of Hadamard transform and Golay auto-correlation calculations. Our experimental analysis confirms the simplex codes with their significant noise reduction ability, which is translated into well formed and accurate mean amplitude calculations. Moreover, the analysis of TDM-FBG-based GCCs have confirmed the unique properties of the auto-correlation process to increase the FBG signals up to around 128 times compared with the single pulse case.
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2877887