Occlusion, transparency, and lightness

The lightness of a visual surface is its perceived achromatic reflectance [Adelson, E. H., (2000). Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.) (pp. 339-351) Berlin: Springer; Gilchrist, A. (1999). Lightness perception. In R. W. F. Kei...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Albert, Mark K. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2007-11.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01466 am a22001213u 4500
001 49009
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Albert, Mark K.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Occlusion, transparency, and lightness 
260 |c 2007-11. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/49009/1/AlbertVR07.pdf 
520 |a The lightness of a visual surface is its perceived achromatic reflectance [Adelson, E. H., (2000). Lightness perception and lightness illusions. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.) (pp. 339-351) Berlin: Springer; Gilchrist, A. (1999). Lightness perception. In R. W. F. Keil (Ed.), MIT encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 471-472). Cambridge: MIT press]. Lightness ranges from black, through various shades of grey, up to white. Anderson and Winawer [Anderson, B., Winawer, J. (2005). Image segmentation and lightness perception. Nature, 434, 79-83] suggested that perceptual decomposition of image luminance into multiple sources in different layers (e.g., perceptual transparency) is critical to the their lightness illusions. However, 1 show that simple perceptual occlusion evoked by T-junctions will work as well, suggesting that perceptual scission of luminance into multiple layers is unnecessary for such effects. I argue that the lightness illusions presented by Anderson and Winawer involve fundamentally different mechanisms than previously studied lightness illusions, including those involving perceptual transparency. 
655 7 |a Article