Reserving a slice of cake
In Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages the Supreme Court held that the promise of a leaseback will not bind a mortgagee. This article criticises the analysis of completion borrowed from Abbey National BS v Cann and suggests that the issue was one of priority rather than proprietary status.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015-08-15.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get fulltext |
| LEADER | 00600 am a22001213u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 384850 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a Sparkes, Peter |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Reserving a slice of cake |
| 260 | |c 2015-08-15. | ||
| 856 | |z Get fulltext |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/384850/1/Reserving_a_slice_of_cake.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a In Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages the Supreme Court held that the promise of a leaseback will not bind a mortgagee. This article criticises the analysis of completion borrowed from Abbey National BS v Cann and suggests that the issue was one of priority rather than proprietary status. | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Article | |