Towards an understanding of adult judgments of synergistic health benefits

Objective: Numerous scientific studies show that certain combinations of dietary and/or lifestyle factors produce health benefits which are greater than the sum of the benefits associated with each factor alone. To address an existing knowledge gap, we assessed the extent to which individuals unders...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dawson, Ian G.J (Author), Dohle, Simone (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2016-02.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02385 am a22001333u 4500
001 380955
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Dawson, Ian G.J.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dohle, Simone  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Towards an understanding of adult judgments of synergistic health benefits 
260 |c 2016-02. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/380955/1/Towards%2520An%2520Understanding%2520of%2520Adult%2520Judgments%2520of%2520Synergistic%2520Health%2520Benefits%2520-%2520Pre-Publication%2520Version.pdf 
520 |a Objective: Numerous scientific studies show that certain combinations of dietary and/or lifestyle factors produce health benefits which are greater than the sum of the benefits associated with each factor alone. To address an existing knowledge gap, we assessed the extent to which individuals understand that certain combinations present these 'synergistic health benefits'. Design: Health benefit judgments were obtained from lay adults for a range of dietary and/or lifestyle combinations that have been found to present synergistic benefits. Association between these judgments and socio-cognitive characteristics such as numeracy, education and health interest were examined. Methods: 352 Swiss adults were presented with a description of one of eight synergistically beneficial combinations. Each participant provided a categorical benefit judgment (i.e., sub-additive, additive or synergistic) for the combination and explained the cognitive reasoning underlying their judgment. Participants completed measures of numeracy and health interest. Results: The proportion of combinations judged to present a synergistic benefit was modest for 'macro-level' combinations (e.g., diet and exercise), but low for 'micro-level' combinations (e.g., two phytochemicals). Cognitive reasoning data showed that a higher proportion of judgments for micro-level (cf. macro-level) combinations were based on greater subjective epistemic uncertainty. Higher interest in health was associated with a better understanding of synergistic benefits, but numeracy and education level were not. Conclusions: There is considerable scope to improve the extent to which lay adults understand that specific combination of diet and lifestyle behaviours can synergistically benefit their health. Our results enable us to make informed recommendations for public health interventions. 
655 7 |a Article