Knowledge is not belief for sufficient (objective and subjective) reason
Mark Schroeder has recently proposed a new analysis of knowledge. I examine that analysis and show that it fails. More specifically, I show that it faces a problem all too familiar from the post-Gettier literature, namely, that it is delivers the wrong verdict in fake barn cases.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get fulltext |
| LEADER | 00759 am a22001213u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 378336 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a Whiting, Daniel |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Knowledge is not belief for sufficient (objective and subjective) reason |
| 260 | |c 2015. | ||
| 856 | |z Get fulltext |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/378336/1/Knowledge%2520is%2520Not%2520Belief%2520for%2520Sufficient%2520%2528Objective%2520and%2520Subjective%2529%2520Reason%2520L%2526E%2520Daniel%2520Whiting.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a Mark Schroeder has recently proposed a new analysis of knowledge. I examine that analysis and show that it fails. More specifically, I show that it faces a problem all too familiar from the post-Gettier literature, namely, that it is delivers the wrong verdict in fake barn cases. | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Article | |