|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01982 am a22001453u 4500 |
001 |
373665 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Wilson, Christopher D.H.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Williams, Ian David
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Kemp, Simon
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Environmental (waste) compliance control systems for UK SMEs
|
260 |
|
|
|c 2015-02-01.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/373665/1/__soton.ac.uk_UDE_PersonalFiles_Users_idw_mydocuments_RESEARCH_PAPERS_2015_WRM-CW-2015.pdf
|
520 |
|
|
|a While the 'environment' is often perceived as a heavily regulated area of business, in reality, directly-regulated businesses represent a small proportion of the business community. This study aimed to evaluate and outline potential improvements to compliance controls for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), particularly those involved in the waste sector. Forty-four SMEs from England were interviewed/audited between April-September 2008. Using a UK-based system as a case-in-point, the Environment Agency's (EA) Operational Risk Appraisal ('Opra')/Compliance Assessment Report (CAR) system was analysed. Environmental compliance performance indicators and an initial assessment methodology for SMEs were developed. The study showed: • Compliance with permitting legislation was poor in many areas. • Regulatory authorities are either unable/failing to implement their enforcement policies or unable/failing to identify non-compliances due to the infrequency or limited nature of their inspections. • Improvements are needed to the EA Opra/CAR system - control measures are not fully taken into account when calculating risk. Recommendations to improve SME compliance controls include using internationally applicable general and specific compliance and non-compliance performance indicators, re-designing the Opra system and using an initial assessment methodology based on understanding the hazardousness of SME categories, compliance levels and operator competency.
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|