|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01347 am a22001453u 4500 |
| 001 |
339236 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Pletcher, Derek
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Li, Xiaohong
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Wang, Shaopeng
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a A comparison of cathodes for zero gap alkaline water electrolysers for hydrogen production
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2012-05-01.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/339236/1/A_comparison_of_cathodes_for_zero_gap_alkaline_water.pdf
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Selected coatings on nickel or stainless steel micromeshes have been examined as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution in conditions mimicking those found in zero gap alkaline water electrolysers. Voltammetry in 4 M NaOH at a temperature of 333 K, shows that Pt, NiMo and RuO2 are the coatings of choice giving a superior performance particularly at higher current densities. NiMo and RuO2 coatings also give stable performance during a 10 day electrolysis in a laboratory, zero gap, alkaline water electrolysis cell with a hydroxide conducting membrane; when combined with a NiFe(OH)2 coated anode, a current density of 1 A cm?2 is achieved with a cell voltage of ?2.1 V. Pt catalyses H2 evolution efficiently at short times of electrolysis but cells with a Pt cathode show an increase in cell voltage from 2.05 V to 2.23 V during the first two days of operation.
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
