Thinking through networks: a review of formal network methods in archaeology

This review aims to expose the potential of formal network methods for archaeology by tracing the origins of the academic traditions, network models and techniques that have been most influential to archaeologists. A brief discussion of graph theoretic applications in archaeology reveals how graph v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brughmans, Tom (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2013-12.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02075 am a22001213u 4500
001 336991
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Brughmans, Tom  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Thinking through networks: a review of formal network methods in archaeology 
260 |c 2013-12. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/336991/1/brughmans_2013_thinking%2520through%2520networks%2520FINAL.pdf 
520 |a This review aims to expose the potential of formal network methods for archaeology by tracing the origins of the academic traditions, network models and techniques that have been most influential to archaeologists. A brief discussion of graph theoretic applications in archaeology reveals how graph visualization and analysis was used since the 1960's in a very similar way to later network analysis applications but did not seem to have influenced the more widespread adoption of network techniques over the past decade. These recent archaeological applications have been strongly influenced by two academic traditions, social network analysis and socio-physics. The most influential and promising techniques and models adopted from these traditions are critically discussed. This review reveals some general trends which are considered to be the result of two critical issues that will need to be addressed in future archaeological network analysis: (1) a general unawareness of the historicity and diversity of formal network methods both within and outside the archaeological discipline has resulted in a very limited methodological scope; (2) the adoption or development of network methods has very rarely been driven by specific archaeological research questions and is dominated by a few popular models and techniques, which has in some cases resulted in a routinized explanatory process. This review illustrates, however, the great potential of formal network methods for archaeology and argues that, if this potential is to be applied in a critical way, a broad multi-disciplinary scope is necessary and specific archaeological research contexts should dominate applications 
655 7 |a Article