How likelihood and identification went Bayesian
This paper considers how the concepts of likelihood and identification became part of Bayesian theory. This makes a nice study in the development of concepts in statistical theory. Likelihood slipped in easily but there was a protracted debate about how identification should be treated. Initially th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2002.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Get fulltext |
| LEADER | 00701 am a22001213u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 33384 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a Aldrich, J. |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a How likelihood and identification went Bayesian |
| 260 | |c 2002. | ||
| 856 | |z Get fulltext |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/33384/1/33384.pdf | ||
| 520 | |a This paper considers how the concepts of likelihood and identification became part of Bayesian theory. This makes a nice study in the development of concepts in statistical theory. Likelihood slipped in easily but there was a protracted debate about how identification should be treated. Initially there was no agreement on whether identification involved the prior, the likelihood or the posterior. | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Article | |