A utility-based adaptive sensing and multi-hop communication protocol for wireless sensor networks

This article reports on the development of a utility-based mechanism for managing sensing and communication in cooperative multisensor networks. The specific application on which we illustrate our mechanism is that of GlacsWeb. This is a deployed system that uses battery-powered sensors to collect e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Padhy, Paritosh (Author), Dash, Rajdeep (Author), Martinez, Kirk (Author), Jennings, Nick (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2010-06.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
Get fulltext
LEADER 02210 am a22001693u 4500
001 267848
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Padhy, Paritosh  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Dash, Rajdeep  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Martinez, Kirk  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jennings, Nick  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A utility-based adaptive sensing and multi-hop communication protocol for wireless sensor networks 
260 |c 2010-06. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/267848/1/final.pdf 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/267848/2/a27-padhy.pdf 
520 |a This article reports on the development of a utility-based mechanism for managing sensing and communication in cooperative multisensor networks. The specific application on which we illustrate our mechanism is that of GlacsWeb. This is a deployed system that uses battery-powered sensors to collect environmental data related to glaciers which it transmits back to a base station so that it can be made available world-wide to researchers. In this context, we first develop a sensing protocol in which each sensor locally adjusts its sensing rate based on the value of the data it believes it will observe. The sensors employ a Bayesian linear model to decide their sampling rate and exploit the properties of the Kullback-Leibler divergence to place an appropriate value on the data. Then, we detail a communication protocol that finds optimal routes for relaying this data back to the base station based on the cost of communicating it (derived from the opportunity cost of using the battery power for relaying data). Finally, we empirically evaluate our protocol by examining the impact on efficiency of a static network topology, a dynamic network topology, the size of the network, the degree of dynamism of the environment, and the mobility of the nodes. In so doing, we demonstrate that the efficiency gains of our new protocol, over the currently implemented method over a 6 month period, are 78%, 133%, 100%, and 93%, respectively. Furthermore, we show that our system performs at 65%, 70%, 63%, and 70% of the theoretical optimal, respectively, despite being a distributed protocol that operates with incomplete knowledge of the environment. 
655 7 |a Article