Ethics of Open Access to Biomedical Research: Just a Special Case of Ethics of Open Access to Research

The ethical case for Open Access (OA) (free online access) to research findings is especially salient when it is public health that is being compromised by needless access restrictions. But the ethical imperative for OA is far more general: It applies to all scientific and scholarly research finding...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harnad, Stevan (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2007.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
Get fulltext
Get fulltext
LEADER 01417 am a22001693u 4500
001 264431
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Harnad, Stevan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Ethics of Open Access to Biomedical Research: Just a Special Case of Ethics of Open Access to Research 
260 |c 2007. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264431/1/PEHM-paper.pdf 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264431/2/PEHM-paper.doc 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264431/3/pehm-harnad.pdf 
520 |a The ethical case for Open Access (OA) (free online access) to research findings is especially salient when it is public health that is being compromised by needless access restrictions. But the ethical imperative for OA is far more general: It applies to all scientific and scholarly research findings published in peer-reviewed journals. And peer-to-peer access is far more important than direct public access. Most research is funded to be conducted and published, by researchers, in order to be taken up, used, and built upon in further research and applications, again by researchers, for the benefit of the public that funded it -- not in order to generate revenue for the peer-reviewed journal publishing industry (nor even because there is a burning public desire to read [much of] it). Hence OA needs to be mandated for all research. 
540 |a other 
540 |a other 
655 7 |a Article