The discourse of social justice within European education policy developments: the example of key competences and indicator development towards assuring the continuation of democracy

Neo-liberal discourse is described by many critical education researchers as almost the only discourse within European education policy making. However, although this discourse clearly exists and is powerful, the author identifies an alternative discourse within European Union policy making which in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hoskins, Bryony (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2008.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01656 am a22001213u 4500
001 208213
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hoskins, Bryony  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The discourse of social justice within European education policy developments: the example of key competences and indicator development towards assuring the continuation of democracy 
260 |c 2008. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/208213/1/6_Hoskins_FIRST_EERJ_7_3_web%255B1%255D.pdf 
520 |a Neo-liberal discourse is described by many critical education researchers as almost the only discourse within European education policy making. However, although this discourse clearly exists and is powerful, the author identifies an alternative discourse within European Union policy making which incorporates narratives of social justice, solidarity and democracy, particularly citing education as a vehicle for these narratives. This article highlights the place of this alternative discourse in the policy process of the identification of key competences and the creation of indicators by which the competences can be evaluated. It uses official texts and direct experience of working in the European Commission's Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning (CRELL) to explain this narrative further, including the process of the development of indicators on certain key competences, such as civic competence and learning to learn and the social justice dialogue that forms the basis for these discussions. The article argues that the absence from critical educational researchers' debates of this narrative leads to an oversimplified understanding of European policy processes. 
655 7 |a Article