Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of inhaled asthma medications: systematic review and research needs
Numerous validated PRO instruments are available but it is unclear why few are used in asthma clinical trials. Problems include poor reporting, and uncritical analysis and interpretation of PRO scores. Research needs include identifying and recommending a set of PROs for use in asthma clinical resea...
Main Authors: | Frampton, Geoff (Author), Shepherd, Jonathan (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2011-04.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get fulltext Get fulltext Get fulltext |
Similar Items
-
Ambiguity of study population analysis and reporting in asthma clinical trials
by: Frampton, Geoff, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Demographic data in asthma clinical trials: a systematic review with implications for generalizing trial findings and tackling health disparities
by: Frampton, Geoff K., et al.
Published: (2009) -
Critical inhaler errors in asthma and COPD: a systematic review of impact on health outcomes
by: Omar Sharif Usmani, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency.
by: Jonathan Shepherd, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Inhaled ciclesonide versus inhaled budesonide or inhaled beclomethasone or inhaled fluticasone for chronic asthma in adults: a systematic review
by: Halpin David MG, et al.
Published: (2006-06-01)