Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings

Participants viewed a videotape of a simulated murder, and their recall (and confidence) was tested 1 week later with the cognitive interview. Results indicated that (a) the subset of statements assigned high confidence was more accurate than the full set of statements; (b) the accuracy benefit was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberts, Wayne T. (Author), Higham, Philip A. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2002.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01213 am a22001333u 4500
001 18315
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Roberts, Wayne T.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Higham, Philip A.  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings 
260 |c 2002. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/18315/1/00042740-200203000-00005.pdf 
520 |a Participants viewed a videotape of a simulated murder, and their recall (and confidence) was tested 1 week later with the cognitive interview. Results indicated that (a) the subset of statements assigned high confidence was more accurate than the full set of statements; (b) the accuracy benefit was limited to information that forensic experts considered relevant to an investigation, whereas peripheral information showed the opposite pattern; (c) the confidence-accuracy relationship was higher for relevant than for peripheral information; (d) the focused-retrieval phase was associated with a greater proportion of peripheral and a lesser proportion of relevant information than the other phases; and (e) only about 50% of the relevant information was elicited, and most of this was elicited in Phase 1. 
655 7 |a Article