|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01213 am a22001333u 4500 |
001 |
18315 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Roberts, Wayne T.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Higham, Philip A.
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Selecting accurate statements from the cognitive interview using confidence ratings
|
260 |
|
|
|c 2002.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/18315/1/00042740-200203000-00005.pdf
|
520 |
|
|
|a Participants viewed a videotape of a simulated murder, and their recall (and confidence) was tested 1 week later with the cognitive interview. Results indicated that (a) the subset of statements assigned high confidence was more accurate than the full set of statements; (b) the accuracy benefit was limited to information that forensic experts considered relevant to an investigation, whereas peripheral information showed the opposite pattern; (c) the confidence-accuracy relationship was higher for relevant than for peripheral information; (d) the focused-retrieval phase was associated with a greater proportion of peripheral and a lesser proportion of relevant information than the other phases; and (e) only about 50% of the relevant information was elicited, and most of this was elicited in Phase 1.
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|