|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01501 am a22001693u 4500 |
| 001 |
144735 |
| 042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
| 100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Juhasz, Barbara J
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Pollatsek, Alexander
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Hyönä, Jukka
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Drieghe, Denis
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Rayner, Keith
|e author
|
| 245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Parafoveal processing within and between words
|
| 260 |
|
|
|c 2009-07.
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/144735/1/Juhasz%252C_Pollatsek%252C_Hyona%252C_Drieghe_%2526_Rayner_%25282009%2529.pdf
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Parafoveal preview was examined within and between words in two eye movement experiments. In Experiment 1, unspaced and spaced English compound words were used (e.g., basketball, tennis ball). Prior to fixating the second lexeme, either a correct or a partial parafoveal preview (e.g., ball or badk) was provided using the boundary paradigm (Rayner, 1975). There was a larger effect of parafoveal preview on unspaced compound words than on spaced compound words. However, the parafoveal preview effect on spaced compound words was larger than would be predicted on the basis of prior research. Experiment 2 examined whether this large effect was due to spaced compounds forming a larger linguistic unit by pairing spaced compounds with nonlexicalized adjective-noun pairs. There were no significant interactions between item type and parafoveal preview, suggesting that it is the syntactic predictability of the noun that is driving the large preview effect.
|
| 655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|
