|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01532 am a22001333u 4500 |
001 |
142841 |
042 |
|
|
|a dc
|
100 |
1 |
0 |
|a Sedikides, Constantine
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Gebauer, Jochen E.
|e author
|
245 |
0 |
0 |
|a Religiosity as self-enhancement: a meta-analysis of the relation between socially desirable responding and religiosity
|
260 |
|
|
|c 2010-02-01.
|
856 |
|
|
|z Get fulltext
|u https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/142841/1/Sedikides%2520%2526%2520Gebauer%252C%2520PSPR%252C%25202010.pdf
|
520 |
|
|
|a In a meta-analysis, the authors test the theoretical formulation that religiosity is a means for self-enhancement. The authors operationalized self-enhancement as socially desirable responding (SDR) and focused on three facets of religiosity: intrinsic,extrinsic, and religion-as-quest. Importantly, they assessed two moderators of the relation between SDR and religiosity. Macrolevel culture reflected countries that varied in degree of religiosity (from high to low: United States, Canada, United Kingdom). Micro-level culture reflected U.S. universities high (christian) versus low (secular) on religiosity. The results were generally consistent with the theoretical formulation. Both macro-level and micro-level culture moderated the relation between SDR and religiosity: This relation was more positive in samples that placed higher value on religiosity (United States > Canada > United Kingdom; christian universities > secular universities). The evidence suggests that religiosity is partly in the service of self-enhancement.
|
655 |
7 |
|
|a Article
|