Investigating the effects of cultural-mindset priming on evaluation of job performance behaviors

Recent reviews of performance evaluation process and practices indicate that there is substantial variability in the structure and formalization of performance evaluations in organizations across cultures and call for further exploration of the role of cultural variables on the performance evaluatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bost, M., Jr (Author), Mishra, V. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02358nam a2200205Ia 4500
001 10.5964-ejop.v14i4.1617
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 18410413 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Investigating the effects of cultural-mindset priming on evaluation of job performance behaviors 
260 0 |b PsychOpen  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i4.1617 
520 3 |a Recent reviews of performance evaluation process and practices indicate that there is substantial variability in the structure and formalization of performance evaluations in organizations across cultures and call for further exploration of the role of cultural variables on the performance evaluation process. In the current study, we use self-construal priming procedures to evaluate the effects of cultural mindset on the performance evaluation process. Specifically, the effects of independent (individualistic) and interdependent (collectivistic) mindset priming on relative importance given to performance behaviors when making judgments of overall job performance was investigated. Participants first completed either independent (n = 87) or interdependent (n = 87) priming tasks by circling either I/me/my or we/us/our in a paragraph of text. Following this, they completed a managerial role-play exercise in which they read employee performance vignettes (manipulated on task, citizenship and counterproductive performance behaviors) and rated the overall performance of each employee. Rater policies were captured using regression analyses and relative weights placed on each performance behavior were computed. Results suggest that when making judgments of overall performance, as compared to raters primed with interdependence, raters primed with independence placed less weight on citizenship behaviors and higher weights on counterproductive performance behaviors. No significant differences were observed in the weights placed on task performance behaviors. Study limitations and implications for research are discussed. © 2018, PsychOpen. All rights reserved. 
650 0 4 |a Collectivism 
650 0 4 |a Individualism 
650 0 4 |a Job performance 
650 0 4 |a Performance evaluation 
650 0 4 |a Self-construal priming 
700 1 |a Bost, M., Jr.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mishra, V.  |e author 
773 |t Europe's Journal of Psychology