What is the value of faith for salvation? A thomistic response to kvanvig

Jonathan Kvanvig has proposed a non-cognitive theory of faith. He argues that the model of faith as essentially involving assent to propositions is of no value. In response, I propose a Thomistic cognitive theory of faith that both avoids Kvanvig's criticism and presents a richer and more inclu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rooney, J.D (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center 2019
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01166nam a2200133Ia 4500
001 10.5840-faithphil20191125134
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 07397046 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a What is the value of faith for salvation? A thomistic response to kvanvig 
260 0 |b Philosophy Documentation Center  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil20191125134 
520 3 |a Jonathan Kvanvig has proposed a non-cognitive theory of faith. He argues that the model of faith as essentially involving assent to propositions is of no value. In response, I propose a Thomistic cognitive theory of faith that both avoids Kvanvig's criticism and presents a richer and more inclusive account of how faith is intrinsically valuable. I show these accounts of faith diverge in what they take as the goal of the Christian life: personal relationship with God or an external state of affairs. For this reason, more seriously, the non-cognitivist project likely requires rejecting traditional Christianity and its picture of salvation. © 2016 ICE Publishing. All rights reserved. 
700 1 |a Rooney, J.D.  |e author 
773 |t Faith and Philosophy