Risk assessment in long-term survival rates of dental implants: A prospective clinical study
Aim: The present study was done to analyze the risk factors associated with dental implants in its survival rate. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 208 patients with 425 dental implants placed. Patients were divided into four groups: group I (diabetes), group II (periodontiti...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher |
LEADER | 03111nam a2200541Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10.5005-jp-journals-10024-2303 | ||
008 | 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d | ||
020 | |a 15263711 (ISSN) | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Risk assessment in long-term survival rates of dental implants: A prospective clinical study |
260 | 0 | |b Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd |c 2018 | |
856 | |z View Fulltext in Publisher |u https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2303 | ||
520 | 3 | |a Aim: The present study was done to analyze the risk factors associated with dental implants in its survival rate. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 208 patients with 425 dental implants placed. Patients were divided into four groups: group I (diabetes), group II (periodontitis), group III (smoking), and group IV (bruxism). All patients were followed for 8 to 10 years for the survival rates. Results: Out of 425 dental implants, 145 were inserted in 72 males and 280 in 136 females. The difference was significant (p = 0.01). Group I had 16 males and 36 females, group II had 20 males and 32 females, group III had 28 males and 24 females, and group IV had 8 males and 44 females. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Out of 425 implants, 90 (21.17%) had failures: 24 dental implants (29%) in group I, 22 dental implants (15.2%) group II, 34 dental implants (27%) in group III, and 10 dental implants (13%) in group IV showed failure. The difference was significant (p < 0.05). Success rate was 70.7% in group I, 83.3% in group II, 80.9% in group III, and 86.3% in group IV. The difference was nonsignificant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Diabetes, periodontitis, bruxism, and smoking are among various causative factors which affect the survival rate of dental implants. These are risk factors leading to implant failures. Clinical significance: Diabetes, periodontitis, bruxism, and smoking are among various causative factors which affect the survival rate of dental implants. © Journal Contemporary Dental Practice 2018. | |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a bruxism |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Bruxism |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Dental implant |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Dental Implants |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a diabetes mellitus |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Diabetes Mellitus |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a female |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Female |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a follow up |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Follow-Up Studies |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a human |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Humans |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a male |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Male |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a periodontitis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Periodontitis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Prospective Studies |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a prospective study |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a prosthesis complication |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Prosthesis Failure |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a risk assessment |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Risk Assessment |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a risk factor |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Risk Factors |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a smoking |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Smoking |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a time factor |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Time Factors |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a tooth implant |
700 | 1 | |a Dharamsi, A.M. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Kaushal, P. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Misurya, A.L. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Mohanty, R. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Mokashi, R. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Sudan, P.S. |e author | |
773 | |t Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice |