Risk assessment in long-term survival rates of dental implants: A prospective clinical study

Aim: The present study was done to analyze the risk factors associated with dental implants in its survival rate. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 208 patients with 425 dental implants placed. Patients were divided into four groups: group I (diabetes), group II (periodontiti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dharamsi, A.M (Author), Kaushal, P. (Author), Misurya, A.L (Author), Mohanty, R. (Author), Mokashi, R. (Author), Sudan, P.S (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03111nam a2200541Ia 4500
001 10.5005-jp-journals-10024-2303
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 15263711 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Risk assessment in long-term survival rates of dental implants: A prospective clinical study 
260 0 |b Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2303 
520 3 |a Aim: The present study was done to analyze the risk factors associated with dental implants in its survival rate. Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 208 patients with 425 dental implants placed. Patients were divided into four groups: group I (diabetes), group II (periodontitis), group III (smoking), and group IV (bruxism). All patients were followed for 8 to 10 years for the survival rates. Results: Out of 425 dental implants, 145 were inserted in 72 males and 280 in 136 females. The difference was significant (p = 0.01). Group I had 16 males and 36 females, group II had 20 males and 32 females, group III had 28 males and 24 females, and group IV had 8 males and 44 females. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Out of 425 implants, 90 (21.17%) had failures: 24 dental implants (29%) in group I, 22 dental implants (15.2%) group II, 34 dental implants (27%) in group III, and 10 dental implants (13%) in group IV showed failure. The difference was significant (p < 0.05). Success rate was 70.7% in group I, 83.3% in group II, 80.9% in group III, and 86.3% in group IV. The difference was nonsignificant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Diabetes, periodontitis, bruxism, and smoking are among various causative factors which affect the survival rate of dental implants. These are risk factors leading to implant failures. Clinical significance: Diabetes, periodontitis, bruxism, and smoking are among various causative factors which affect the survival rate of dental implants. © Journal Contemporary Dental Practice 2018. 
650 0 4 |a bruxism 
650 0 4 |a Bruxism 
650 0 4 |a Dental implant 
650 0 4 |a Dental Implants 
650 0 4 |a diabetes mellitus 
650 0 4 |a Diabetes Mellitus 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a follow up 
650 0 4 |a Follow-Up Studies 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a periodontitis 
650 0 4 |a Periodontitis 
650 0 4 |a Prospective Studies 
650 0 4 |a prospective study 
650 0 4 |a prosthesis complication 
650 0 4 |a Prosthesis Failure 
650 0 4 |a risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a Risk Assessment 
650 0 4 |a risk factor 
650 0 4 |a Risk Factors 
650 0 4 |a smoking 
650 0 4 |a Smoking 
650 0 4 |a time factor 
650 0 4 |a Time Factors 
650 0 4 |a tooth implant 
700 1 |a Dharamsi, A.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kaushal, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Misurya, A.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mohanty, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mokashi, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sudan, P.S.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice