Gender bias at scale: Evidence from the usage of personal names
Recent research within the computational social sciences has shown that when computational models of lexical semantics are trained on standard natural-language corpora, they embody many of the implicit biases that are seen in human behavior (Caliskan, Bryson, & Narayanan, 2017). In the present s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer New York LLC
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher |
LEADER | 02189nam a2200361Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10.3758-s13428-019-01234-0 | ||
008 | 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d | ||
020 | |a 1554351X (ISSN) | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gender bias at scale: Evidence from the usage of personal names |
260 | 0 | |b Springer New York LLC |c 2019 | |
856 | |z View Fulltext in Publisher |u https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01234-0 | ||
520 | 3 | |a Recent research within the computational social sciences has shown that when computational models of lexical semantics are trained on standard natural-language corpora, they embody many of the implicit biases that are seen in human behavior (Caliskan, Bryson, & Narayanan, 2017). In the present study, we aimed to build on this work and demonstrate that there is a large and systematic bias in the use of personal names in the natural-language environment, such that male names are much more prevalent than female names. This bias holds over an analysis of billions of words of text, subcategorized into different genres within fiction novels, nonfiction books, and subtitles from television and film. Additionally, we showed that this bias holds across time, with more recent work displaying the same patterns as work published tens or hundreds of years previously. Finally, we showed that the main cause of the bias comes from male authors perpetuating the bias toward male names, with female authors showing a much smaller bias. This work demonstrates the potential of big-data analyses to shed light on large-scale trends in human behavior and to elucidate their causes. © 2019, The Psychonomic Society, Inc. | |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Big data |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Computational social science |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Corpus studies |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Distributional modeling |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a female |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Female |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Gender bias |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a human |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Humans |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Lexical organization |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a male |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Male |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Names |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a nomenclature |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a semantics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Semantics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a sexism |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Sexism |
700 | 1 | |a Dye, M. |e author | |
700 | 1 | |a Johns, B.T. |e author | |
773 | |t Behavior Research Methods |