Attentional bias induced by stimulus control (ABC) impairs measures of the approximate number system

• Main Authors: Lindskog, M. (Author), Poom, L. (Author), Winman, A. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Springer 2021
• Subjects: achievement; Achievement; Approximate number system; attention; Attention; attentional bias; Attentional Bias; Eye-tracking; human; Humans; Mathematical performance; mathematics; Mathematics; Numerical cognition; Numerosity judgments; Stimulus control
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Pervasive congruency effects characterize approximate number discrimination tasks. Performance is better on congruent (the more numerous stimulus consists of objects of larger size that occupy a larger area) than on incongruent (where the opposite holds) items. The congruency effects typically occur when controlling for nonnumeric variables such as cumulative area. Furthermore, only performance on incongruent stimuli seems to predict math abilities. Here, we present evidence for an attentional-bias induced by stimulus control (ABC) where preattentive features such as item size reflexively influence decisions, which can explain these congruency effects. In three experiments, we tested predictions derived from the ABC. In Experiment 1, as predicted, we found that manipulation of size introduced congruency effects and eliminated the correlation with math ability for congruent items. However, performance on incongruent items and neutral, nonmanipulated items were still predictive of math ability. A negative correlation between performance on congruent and incongruent items even indicated that they measure different underlying constructs. Experiment 2 demonstrated, in line with the ABC account, that increasing presentation time reduced congruency effects. By directly measuring overt attention using eye-tracking, Experiment 3 revealed that people direct their first gaze toward the array with items of larger individual size, biasing them towards these arrays. The ABC explains why the relation between performance on approximate number discrimination tasks and math achievement has been fragile and suggests that stimulus control manipulations have contaminated the results. We discuss the importance of using stimuli that are representative of the environment. © 2021, The Author(s).