Neural Networks for Automatic Posture Recognition in Ambient-Assisted Living

Human Action Recognition (HAR) is a rapidly evolving field impacting numerous domains, among which is Ambient Assisted Living (AAL). In such a context, the aim of HAR is meeting the needs of frail individuals, whether elderly and/or disabled and promoting autonomous, safe and secure living. To this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beltrami, G. (Author), Guerra, B.M.V (Author), Ramat, S. (Author), Schmid, M. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NLM (Medline) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02723nam a2200421Ia 4500
001 10.3390-s22072609
008 220425s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14248220 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Neural Networks for Automatic Posture Recognition in Ambient-Assisted Living 
260 0 |b NLM (Medline)  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/s22072609 
520 3 |a Human Action Recognition (HAR) is a rapidly evolving field impacting numerous domains, among which is Ambient Assisted Living (AAL). In such a context, the aim of HAR is meeting the needs of frail individuals, whether elderly and/or disabled and promoting autonomous, safe and secure living. To this goal, we propose a monitoring system detecting dangerous situations by classifying human postures through Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions. The developed algorithm works on a set of features computed from the skeleton data provided by four Kinect One systems simultaneously recording the scene from different angles and identifying the posture of the subject in an ecological context within each recorded frame. Here, we compare the recognition abilities of Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) Sequence networks. Starting from the set of previously selected features we performed a further feature selection based on an SVM algorithm for the optimization of the MLP network and used a genetic algorithm for selecting the features for the LSTM sequence model. We then optimized the architecture and hyperparameters of both models before comparing their performances. The best MLP model (3 hidden layers and a Softmax output layer) achieved 78.4%, while the best LSTM (2 bidirectional LSTM layers, 2 dropout and a fully connected layer) reached 85.7%. The analysis of the performances on individual classes highlights the better suitability of the LSTM approach. 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a Aged 
650 0 4 |a Ambient Intelligence 
650 0 4 |a ambient-assisted living 
650 0 4 |a artificial intelligence 
650 0 4 |a artificial intelligence 
650 0 4 |a Artificial Intelligence 
650 0 4 |a body position 
650 0 4 |a deep learning 
650 0 4 |a feature selection 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human action recognition 
650 0 4 |a human activities 
650 0 4 |a Human Activities 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a kinect 
650 0 4 |a machine learning 
650 0 4 |a neural networks 
650 0 4 |a Neural Networks, Computer 
650 0 4 |a Posture 
650 0 4 |a visual sensor-based 
700 1 |a Beltrami, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Guerra, B.M.V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ramat, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Schmid, M.  |e author 
773 |t Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)