Log-normal or over-dispersed poisson?

Although both over-dispersed Poisson and log-normal chain-ladder models are popular in claim reserving, it is not obvious when to choose which model. Yet, the two models are obviously different. While the over-dispersed Poisson model imposes the variance to mean ratio to be common across the array,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harnau, J. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01405nam a2200169Ia 4500
001 10.3390-risks6030070
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 22279091 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Log-normal or over-dispersed poisson? 
260 0 |b MDPI AG  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/risks6030070 
520 3 |a Although both over-dispersed Poisson and log-normal chain-ladder models are popular in claim reserving, it is not obvious when to choose which model. Yet, the two models are obviously different. While the over-dispersed Poisson model imposes the variance to mean ratio to be common across the array, the log-normal model assumes the same for the standard deviation to mean ratio. Leveraging this insight, we propose a test that has the power to distinguish between the two models. The theory is asymptotic, but it does not build on a large size of the array and, instead, makes use of information accumulating within the cells. The test has a non-standard asymptotic distribution; however, saddle point approximations are available. We show in a simulation study that these approximations are accurate and that the test performs well in finite samples and has high power. © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a Chain-ladder 
650 0 4 |a Encompassing 
650 0 4 |a Non-nested testing 
700 1 |a Harnau, J.  |e author 
773 |t Risks