Balancing multiple roles of repositories: Developing a comprehensive repository at Carnegie Mellon University

Many academic and research institutions today maintain multiple types of institutional repositories operating on different systems and platforms to accommodate the needs and governance of the materials they house. Often, these institutions support multiple repository infrastructures, as these system...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scherer, D. (Author), Valen, D. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02366nam a2200253Ia 4500
001 10.3390-publications7020030
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 23046775 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Balancing multiple roles of repositories: Developing a comprehensive repository at Carnegie Mellon University 
260 0 |b MDPI AG  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020030 
520 3 |a Many academic and research institutions today maintain multiple types of institutional repositories operating on different systems and platforms to accommodate the needs and governance of the materials they house. Often, these institutions support multiple repository infrastructures, as these systems and platforms are not able to accommodate the broad range of materials that an institution creates. Announced in 2017, the Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Libraries implemented a new repository solution and service model. Built upon the Figshare for Institutions platform, the KiltHub repository has taken on the role of a traditional institutional repository and institutional data repository, meeting the disparate needs of its researchers, faculty, and students. This paper will review how the CMU Libraries implemented the KiltHub repository and how the repository services was redeveloped to provide a more encompassing solution for traditional institutional repository materials and research datasets. Additionally, this paper will summarize how the CMU University Libraries surveyed the current repository landscape, decided to implement Figshare for Institutions as a comprehensive institutional repository, revised its previous repository service model to accommodate the influx of new material types, and what needed to be developed for campus engagement. This paper is based upon a presentation of the same title delivered at the 2018 Open Repositories Conference held at Montana State University in Bozeman, Montana. © 2020 by the authors. 
650 0 4 |a Carnegie mellon university 
650 0 4 |a Engagement 
650 0 4 |a Institutional repositories 
650 0 4 |a Open access 
650 0 4 |a Open data 
650 0 4 |a Open scholarship 
650 0 4 |a Open science 
650 0 4 |a Research data 
650 0 4 |a Scholarly communications 
700 1 |a Scherer, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Valen, D.  |e author 
773 |t Publications