Comparing the Time-Dependent Evolution of Microcirculation in Gracilis vs. ALT Flaps Using Laser-Doppler Flowmetry and Tissue-Spectrometry

• Main Authors: Alt, V. (Author), Ehrl, D. (Author), Frank, K. (Author), Giunta, R.E (Author), Heidekrueger, P.I (Author), Moellhoff, N. (Author), Pistek, S. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI 2022
• Subjects: anastomosis; free flap; microsurgery; microvascular flow; O2C
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Postoperative free flap monitoring is considered a key component of care after microsurgical reconstruction. To achieve successful flap salvage after surgical revision, early recognition of vascular compromise is required. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the time-dependent evolution of microcirculation in gracilis muscle (GM) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. This study included continuous measurements of blood flow (flow), hemoglobin oxygenation (SO2 ) and the relative amount of hemoglobin (rHb) using laser-doppler flowmetry and tissue-spectrometry (O2C, LEA Medizintechnik, Gießen, Germany) over a time-period of 72 h. Microcirculation was assessed in a total of 66 viable free flaps (GM n = 40; ALT n = 26). A statistically significant positive correlation between time post-anastomosis and microvascular flow was found for both GM and ALT flaps with rs = 0.384 (p < 0.001) and rs = 0.178 (p = 0.015), respectively. No significant positive or negative correlations between time post-anastomosis and SO2 were found for both GM and ALT flaps with rs = 0.052 (p = 0.387) and rs = −0.018 (p = 0.805), respectively. Overall, a significant negative correlation between time post-anastomosis and rHb was found for GM flaps with rs = −0.140 (p = 0.019). For ALT flaps, no significant positive or negative correlation was found with rs = −0.011 (p = 0.887). Microcirculation differs in different flap entities, and surgeons should be aware of these differences in order to correctly evaluate and classify the values of flow, SO2 and rHb obtained when using the O2C device for postoperative monitoring. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.