Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Revascularisation of the Femoropopliteal Arterial Segment in Patients with Anticoagulant versus Antiplatelet Therapy: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

To prevent atherothrombotic events, patients with peripheral arterial disease are typically prescribed antiplatelet therapy (APT). However, some of them receive anticoagulant therapy (ACT) due to comorbidities. Our aim was to determine possible differences in the effectiveness and safety of both tre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blinc, A. (Author), Boc, A. (Author), Boc, V. (Author), Cuderman, T.V (Author), Kejžar, N. (Author), Pelicon, K. (Author), Petek, K. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02585nam a2200313Ia 4500
001 10.3390-jcdd9070207
008 220718s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 23083425 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Revascularisation of the Femoropopliteal Arterial Segment in Patients with Anticoagulant versus Antiplatelet Therapy: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070207 
520 3 |a To prevent atherothrombotic events, patients with peripheral arterial disease are typically prescribed antiplatelet therapy (APT). However, some of them receive anticoagulant therapy (ACT) due to comorbidities. Our aim was to determine possible differences in the effectiveness and safety of both treatments in patients after endovascular femoropopliteal revascularisation. We retrospectively analysed 1247 patients after successful femoropopliteal revascularisation performed in a single tertiary medical centre and classified them into the ACT or APT group, based on their prescribed treatment. The groups were characterised by descriptive statistics, and their characteristics were adjusted for confounders by propensity score matching. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were assessed within one year after revascularisation. The odds ratio for the composite outcome of all-cause death, PAD exacerbation, and major amputation due to vascular causes with ACT versus APT was 1.21 (95% CI 0.53–2.21; p = 0.484). The odds ratio for major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis with ACT versus APT was 0.77 (95% CI 0.13–3.84; p = 0.251). We found no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness and safety of ACT, when compared to APT in patients with similar cardiovascular risk factors and other baseline characteristics. Further prospective research is warranted. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a anticoagulants 
650 0 4 |a effectiveness 
650 0 4 |a endovascular procedures 
650 0 4 |a femoral artery 
650 0 4 |a peripheral arterial disease 
650 0 4 |a platelet aggregation inhibitors 
650 0 4 |a propensity score 
650 0 4 |a safety 
650 0 4 |a treatment outcome 
700 1 |a Blinc, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Boc, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Boc, V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Cuderman, T.V.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kejžar, N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Pelicon, K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Petek, K.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease