Calibration Dependencies and Accuracy Assessment of a Silicone Rubber 3D Printer

Silicone rubbers are relatively new in additive manufacturing, with only a few commercial printing services and reports on custom-built printers available. Publications and standards on calibration and accuracy assessment are especially lacking. In this study, the printhead calibration process of a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaksa, L. (Author), Kronreif, G. (Author), Lorenz, A. (Author), Pahr, D. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02208nam a2200241Ia 4500
001 10.3390-inventions7020035
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 24115134 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Calibration Dependencies and Accuracy Assessment of a Silicone Rubber 3D Printer 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions7020035 
520 3 |a Silicone rubbers are relatively new in additive manufacturing, with only a few commercial printing services and reports on custom-built printers available. Publications and standards on calibration and accuracy assessment are especially lacking. In this study, the printhead calibration process of a custom-built silicone printer is explained, and a set of test objects isproposed and evaluated. The printer in use is based on an open-source filament printer, capable of multi-material printing with silicone rubbers and thermoplastic polymers. Three different high-viscosity single-component liquid silicone rubbers and one polylactic acid thermoplastic filament were used as printing mate-rials. First, the calibration process of the silicone printhead was conducted, and the dependency of the dosing accuracy on silicone viscosity, nozzle diameter and extrusion speed was evaluated. Sec-ond, various test specimens were proposed and printed to characterize the accuracy and geometric limitations of this printer. These test parts contained features such as thin walls, slender towers, small holes and slots, unsupported overhangs and bridges. It was concluded that silicone viscosity strongly affects geometric inaccuracies. Design recommendations were deducted from the results, advising for wall thicknesses above 1 mm, slenderness ratios below 2, bridging lengths below 2 mm and unsupported overhang angles below 30°. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a 3D printing 
650 0 4 |a additive manufacturing 
650 0 4 |a calibration 
650 0 4 |a silicone rubber 
650 0 4 |a test geometry 
650 0 4 |a viscosity 
700 1 |a Jaksa, L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kronreif, G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lorenz, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Pahr, D.  |e author 
773 |t Inventions