Relationships between employees’ identifications and citizenship behavior in work groups: The role of the regularity and intensity of interactions

This paper explores the relationships of various employees’ identifications (personal, inter-personal, micro-group, group and organizational) in their two components (cognitive and affective) with two dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): offering quality ideas and sugges-tions, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Borokhovski, E.F (Author), Sidorenkov, A.V (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02461nam a2200229Ia 4500
001 10.3390-bs11070092
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 2076328X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Relationships between employees’ identifications and citizenship behavior in work groups: The role of the regularity and intensity of interactions 
260 0 |b MDPI AG  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11070092 
520 3 |a This paper explores the relationships of various employees’ identifications (personal, inter-personal, micro-group, group and organizational) in their two components (cognitive and affective) with two dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): offering quality ideas and sugges-tions, and providing help and support within small work groups. Two studies were conducted in Russia on two respective samples: (1) employees of commercial enterprises (N = 183) characterized by a relatively high regularity and intensity of within-group interactions; and (2) the academic staff of higher education institutions (N = 157), which typically have relatively less regular, low-intensity within-group interactions. The research employed four questionnaires to assess the participants’ identifications in both of their components. In addition, managers in the respective organizations filled out an organizational communicativeness questionnaire and a two-factor OCB assessment instrument. It was found that the relationships between (a) particular identifications and (b) the ratio of group identification to other identifications, on the one hand, and OCB, on the other, depend on the degree of regularity of within-group interactions, as well as on the identification components. Organizational communicativeness did not moderate the relationship between identifications and OCB, but was significantly positively correlated with both OCB dimensions. The theoretical and practical implications of the study findings are discussed. © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a Group identification 
650 0 4 |a Interpersonal identification 
650 0 4 |a Micro-group identification 
650 0 4 |a Organizational citizenship behavior 
650 0 4 |a Organizational communicativeness 
650 0 4 |a Organizational identification 
650 0 4 |a Personal identification 
700 1 |a Borokhovski, E.F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sidorenkov, A.V.  |e author 
773 |t Behavioral Sciences