|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01504nam a2200193Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
10.17454-PAM-2007 |
| 008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 22807853 (ISSN)
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Countering harmful speech online. (In)effective strategies and the duty to counterspeak
|
| 260 |
|
0 |
|b Rosenberg and Sellier
|c 2021
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.17454/PAM-2007
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a The concept of counterspeech denotes a non-coercive and non-censoring method for reacting to harmful speech, with the aim of impeding or at least diminishing its damaging effects. Remarkable work is being done by researchers and activist groups on elaborating practical strategies of countering hate speech online. Though, research in moral and political philosophy exploring the effectivity of counterspeech and grounding the reasons for engaging in it still remains in its early stages. In the following paragraphs I will address recent contributions which elaborate on the viability and normative aspects of counterspeech. Outlining their valuable insights, but also their failure to give due importance to the peculiarities of online speech dynamics, I will highlight relevant features on which future research about online harmful speech and counterspeech can build. © The Author(s) 2021
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Bystander
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Complicity
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Counterspeech
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Digital harmful speech
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Social media
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Donzelli, S.
|e author
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Phenomenology and Mind
|
