|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01741nam a2200217Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1371-journal.pcbi.1009032 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 1553734X (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a On testing structural identifiability by a simple scaling method: Relying on scaling symmetries can be misleading
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Public Library of Science
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009032
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a A recent paper published in PLOS Computational Biology [1] introduces the Scaling Invariance Method (SIM) for analysing structural local identifiability and observability. These two properties define mathematically the possibility of determining the values of the parameters (identifiability) and states (observability) of a dynamic model by observing its output. In this note we warn that SIM considers scaling symmetries as the only possible cause of non-identifiability and non-observability. We show that other types of symmetries can cause the same problems without being detected by SIM, and that in those cases the method may lead one to conclude that the model is identifiable and observable when it is actually not. Copyright: © 2021 Villaverde, Massonis. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a biology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Computational Biology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Models, Theoretical
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a theoretical model
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Massonis, G.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Villaverde, A.F.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t PLoS Computational Biology
|