Benefits and limitations for the use of radiation dose management systems in medical imaging. Practical experience in a university hospital

OBJECTIVES: Radiation dose management systems (DMS) are currently used to help improve radiation protection in medical imaging and interventions. This study presents our experience using a homemade DMS called DOLQA (Dose On-Line for Quality Assurance). METHODS: Our DMS is connected to 14 X-ray syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernández, J.M (Author), Sanchez, R.M (Author), Ten, J.I (Author), Vano, E. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NLM (Medline) 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03114nam a2200313Ia 4500
001 10.1259-bjr.20211340
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 1748880X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Benefits and limitations for the use of radiation dose management systems in medical imaging. Practical experience in a university hospital 
260 0 |b NLM (Medline)  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211340 
520 3 |a OBJECTIVES: Radiation dose management systems (DMS) are currently used to help improve radiation protection in medical imaging and interventions. This study presents our experience using a homemade DMS called DOLQA (Dose On-Line for Quality Assurance). METHODS: Our DMS is connected to 14 X-ray systems in a university hospital linked to the central data repository of a large network of 16 public hospitals in the Autonomous Community of Madrid, with 6.7 million inhabitants. The system allows us to manage individual patient dose data and groups of procedures with the same clinical indications, and compare them with diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). The system can also help to prioritise optimisation actions. RESULTS: This study includes results of imaging examinations from 2020, with 37,601 procedures and 286,471 radiation events included in the radiation dose structured reports (RDSR), for computed tomography (CT), interventional procedures, positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT) and mammography. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of the system include: automatic registration and management of patient doses, creation of dose reports for patients, information on recurrent examinations, high dose alerts, and help to define optimisation actions.The system requires the support of medical physicists and implication of radiologists and radiographers. DMSs must undergo periodic quality controls and audit reports must be drawn up and submitted to the hospital's quality committee.The drawbacks of DMSs include the need for continuous external support (medical physics experts, radiologists, radiographers, technical services of imaging equipment and hospital informatics services) and the need to include data on clinical indication for the imaging procedures. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DMS perform automatic management of radiation doses, produces patient dose reports, and registers high dose alerts to suggest optimisation actions. Benefits and limitations are derived from the practical experience in a large university hospital. 
650 0 4 |a Hospitals, University 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography 
650 0 4 |a positron emission tomography-computed tomography 
650 0 4 |a Radiation Dosage 
650 0 4 |a radiation dose 
650 0 4 |a radiation protection 
650 0 4 |a Radiation Protection 
650 0 4 |a radiography 
650 0 4 |a Radiography 
650 0 4 |a university hospital 
700 1 |a Fernández, J.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sanchez, R.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ten, J.I.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vano, E.  |e author 
773 |t The British journal of radiology