|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03485nam a2200589Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1259-bjr.20211088 |
008 |
220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 1748880X (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Clinical outcomes and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with metastatic solid tumors
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b NLM (Medline)
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20211088
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to report disease outcomes and toxicity with the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of pediatric metastatic disease. METHODS: All pediatric and adolescent young adult (AYA) patients' who received SBRT were included between the years 2000 and 2020. Study endpoints included local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence (CI) of death or local failure and toxicity. The end points with respect to survival and LC were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. The cumulative incidence of local failure was calculated using death as a competing risk. RESULTS: 16 patients with 36 lesions irradiated met inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort. The median OS and PFS for the entire cohort were 17 months and 15.7 months, respectively. The 1 year OS for the entire cohort was 75%. The 6- and 12 month local control was 85 and 78%, respectively. There were no local failures in irradiated lesions for patients who received a BED10≥100 Gy. Patients who were treated with SBRT who had ≤5 metastatic lesions at first recurrence had a superior 1 year OS of 100 vs 50% for those with >5 lesions. One patient (6.3%) experienced a Grade 3 central nervous system toxicity. CONCLUSION: LC was excellent with SBRT delivered to metastatic disease, particularly for lesions receiving a BED10≥100 Gy. High-grade toxicity was rare in our patient population. Patients with five or fewer metastatic sites have a significantly better OS compared to >5 sites. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates that SBRT is safe and efficacious in the treatment of pediatric oligometastatic disease.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adolescent
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adverse event
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Child
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Kaplan Meier method
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Kaplan-Meier Estimate
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a neoplasm
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Neoplasms
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Neoplasms, Second Primary
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Progression-Free Survival
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a radiosurgery
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Radiosurgery
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Retrospective Studies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a retrospective study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a second cancer
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a treatment outcome
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Treatment Outcome
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a young adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Young Adult
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Aldrink, J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Baliga, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Cadieux, C.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Cetnar, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Cripe, T.P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Ewing, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Gupta, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Klamer, B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mardis, E.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Matsui, J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Olshefski, R.S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Palmer, J.D.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Roberts, R.D.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Scharschmidt, T.J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Setty, B.A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Yeager, N.D.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t The British journal of radiology
|