Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews

Principles and framework for assessing the risk of bias for studies included in comparative quantitative environmental systematic reviews

The internal validity of conclusions about effectiveness or impact in systematic reviews, and of decisions based on them, depends on risk of bias assessments being conducted appropriately. However, a random sample of 50 recently-published articles claiming to be quantitative environmental systematic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bennett, M. (Author), Bilotta, G. (Author), Dorne, J.-L.C.M (Author), Eales, J. (Author), Frampton, G. (Author), James, K. (Author), Kohl, C. (Author), Land, M. (Author), Livoreil, B. (Author), Makowski, D. (Author), Muchiri, E. (Author), Petrokofsky, G. (Author), Randall, N. (Author), Schofield, K. (Author), Whaley, P. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2022
Subjects:
Bias
Blinding
Critical appraisal
External validity
Internal validity
Quality assessment
Risk of bias
Systematic error
Validity
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher

Similar Items

Similar Items