|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03177nam a2200457Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1186-s12911-022-01853-2 |
008 |
220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 14726947 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Machine learning to predict no reflow and in-hospital mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction that underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b BioMed Central Ltd
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01853-2
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Background: The machine learning algorithm (MLA) was implemented to establish an optimal model to predict the no reflow (NR) process and in-hospital death that occurred in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Methods: The data were obtained retrospectively from 854 STEMI patients who underwent pPCI. MLA was applied to predict the potential NR phenomenon and confirm the in-hospital mortality. A random sampling method was used to split the data into the training (66.7%) and testing (33.3%) sets. The final results were an average of 10 repeated procedures. The area under the curve (AUC) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the receiver operator characteristic were measured. Results: A random forest algorithm (RAN) had optimal discrimination for the NR phenomenon with an AUC of 0.7891 (95% CI: 0.7093–0.8688) compared with 0.6437 (95% CI: 0.5506–0.7368) for the decision tree (CTREE), 0.7488 (95% CI: 0.6613–0.8363) for the support vector machine (SVM), and 0.681 (95% CI: 0.5767–0.7854) for the neural network algorithm (NNET). The optimal RAN AUC for in-hospital mortality was 0.9273 (95% CI: 0.8819–0.9728), for SVM, 0.8935 (95% CI: 0.826–0.9611); NNET, 0.7756 (95% CI: 0.6559–0.8952); and CTREE, 0.7885 (95% CI: 0.6738–0.9033). Conclusions: The MLA had a relatively higher performance when evaluating the NR risk and in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI and could be utilized in clinical decision making. © 2022, The Author(s).
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a coronary angiography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Coronary Angiography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a hospital mortality
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hospital Mortality
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a In-hospital mortality
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a machine learning
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Machine learning
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Machine Learning
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a no reflow phenomenon
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a No-reflow
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a No-Reflow Phenomenon
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a percutaneous coronary intervention
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Retrospective Studies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a retrospective study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a ST segment elevation myocardial infarction
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a ST-elevation myocardial infarction
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Deng, L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Huang, D.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Su, X.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Zeng, X.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Zhao, X.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Zhou, M.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
|