Validity of self-reported number of teeth in middle-aged Finnish adults: The Northern Finland Birth Cohort Study 1966

Background: We examined the validity of self-reported number of teeth in middle-aged adults by using representative cohort data to compare corresponding self-reported and clinical values. Methods: This validity study is part of the representative 46-year-old follow-up of the Northern Finland Birth C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nieminen, P. (Author), Similä, T. (Author), Virtanen, J.I (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02968nam a2200481Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s12903-018-0666-4
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14726831 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Validity of self-reported number of teeth in middle-aged Finnish adults: The Northern Finland Birth Cohort Study 1966 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0666-4 
520 3 |a Background: We examined the validity of self-reported number of teeth in middle-aged adults by using representative cohort data to compare corresponding self-reported and clinical values. Methods: This validity study is part of the representative 46-year-old follow-up of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC1966) Study. Mailed questionnaires (n=5950) requested information on self-reported number of teeth and background variables (education, tooth brushing and smoking), while clinical oral health examinations (n=1891) assessed the number of teeth (the 'gold standard'). The main analyses compared the self-reported and clinical values for the number of teeth in 1669 participants. Scatterplot and Bland-Altman plot served for visual analyses, and alternative correlation coefficients (Pearson, Spearman, intraclass) for numerical comparisons separately for men and women, with stratification according to background variables. Results: The clinical assessment revealed that the mean value for the number of teeth was 27.46 (SD=2.38), while the corresponding value based on self-reported information was 27.48 (SD=2.78). According to the Bland-Altman plot, the mean difference between the clinical and self-reported values was 0.02 (95% limits of agreement, LoA: 3.37 to 3.32). The observed ranges of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) among men and women were 0.72 to 0.95 and 0.72 to 0.85, respectively, depending on the background variables. Conclusions: Self-reported number of teeth in middle-aged Finnish adults agreed closely with the corresponding clinical measure. © 2018 The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a Cross-Sectional Studies 
650 0 4 |a cross-sectional study 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a Finland 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Longitudinal Studies 
650 0 4 |a longitudinal study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a middle aged 
650 0 4 |a Middle Aged 
650 0 4 |a periodontal disease 
650 0 4 |a psychology 
650 0 4 |a questionnaire 
650 0 4 |a reproducibility 
650 0 4 |a Reproducibility of Results 
650 0 4 |a self report 
650 0 4 |a Self report 
650 0 4 |a Self Report 
650 0 4 |a Surveys and Questionnaires 
650 0 4 |a Tooth 
650 0 4 |a Tooth loss 
650 0 4 |a Tooth Loss 
650 0 4 |a Validity 
700 1 |a Nieminen, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Similä, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Virtanen, J.I.  |e author 
773 |t BMC Oral Health