Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: A comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models

Backgrounds: The occlusal registration of virtual models taken by intraoral scanners sometimes shows patterns which seem much different from the patients' occlusion. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the accuracy of virtual occlusion by comparing virtual occlusal contact area with actual o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cha, J. (Author), Chun, Y.-S (Author), Kim, M. (Author), Lee, H. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03071nam a2200445Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s12903-018-0566-7
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14726831 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: A comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0566-7 
520 3 |a Backgrounds: The occlusal registration of virtual models taken by intraoral scanners sometimes shows patterns which seem much different from the patients' occlusion. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the accuracy of virtual occlusion by comparing virtual occlusal contact area with actual occlusal contact area using a plaster model in vitro. Methods: Plaster dental models, 24 sets of Class I models and 20 sets of Class II models, were divided into a Molar, Premolar, and Anterior group. The occlusal contact areas calculated by the Prescale method and the virtual occlusion by scanning method were compared, and the ratio of the molar and incisor area were compared in order to find any particular tendencies. Results: There was no significant difference between the Prescale results and the scanner results in both the molar and premolar groups (p = 0.083 and 0.053, respectively). On the other hand, there was a significant difference between the Prescale and the scanner results in the anterior group with the scanner results presenting overestimation of the occlusal contact points (p < 0.05). In Molars group, the regression analysis shows that the two variables express linear correlation and has a linear equation with a slope of 0.917. R2 is 0.930. Groups of Premolars and Anteriors had a week linear relationship and greater dispersion. Conclusions: Difference between the actual and virtual occlusion revealed in the anterior portion, where overestimation was observed in the virtual model obtained from the scanning method. Nevertheless, molar and premolar areas showed relatively accurate occlusal contact area in the virtual model. © 2018 The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a comparative study 
650 0 4 |a computer interface 
650 0 4 |a Dental Models 
650 0 4 |a Dental Occlusion 
650 0 4 |a dental procedure 
650 0 4 |a diagnostic imaging 
650 0 4 |a Digital intraoral scanner 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Imaging, Three-Dimensional 
650 0 4 |a in vitro study 
650 0 4 |a In Vitro Techniques 
650 0 4 |a malocclusion 
650 0 4 |a Malocclusion, Angle Class I 
650 0 4 |a Malocclusion, Angle Class II 
650 0 4 |a Occlusal contact areas 
650 0 4 |a pathology 
650 0 4 |a three dimensional imaging 
650 0 4 |a tooth occlusion 
650 0 4 |a User-Computer Interface 
650 0 4 |a Virtual occlusion 
700 1 |a Cha, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Chun, Y.-S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kim, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lee, H.  |e author 
773 |t BMC Oral Health