Accurate plant pathogen effector protein classification ab initio with deepredeff: an ensemble of convolutional neural networks

Background: Plant pathogens cause billions of dollars of crop loss every year and are a major threat to global food security. Effector proteins are the tools such pathogens use to infect the cell, predicting effectors de novo from sequence is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the sequences....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristianingsih, R. (Author), MacLean, D. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2021
Subjects:
AI
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03382nam a2200493Ia 4500
001 10.1186-s12859-021-04293-3
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 14712105 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Accurate plant pathogen effector protein classification ab initio with deepredeff: an ensemble of convolutional neural networks 
260 0 |b BioMed Central Ltd  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04293-3 
520 3 |a Background: Plant pathogens cause billions of dollars of crop loss every year and are a major threat to global food security. Effector proteins are the tools such pathogens use to infect the cell, predicting effectors de novo from sequence is difficult because of the heterogeneity of the sequences. We hypothesised that deep learning classifiers based on Convolutional Neural Networks would be able to identify effectors and deliver new insights. Results: We created a training set of manually curated effector sequences from PHI-Base and used these to train a range of model architectures for classifying bacteria, fungal and oomycete sequences. The best performing classifiers had accuracies from 93 to 84%. The models were tested against popular effector detection software on our own test data and data provided with those models. We observed better performance from our models. Specifically our models showed greater accuracy and lower tendencies to call false positives on a secreted protein negative test set and a greater generalisability. We used GRAD-CAM activation map analysis to identify the sequences that activated our CNN-LSTM models and found short but distinct N-terminal regions in each taxon that was indicative of effector sequences. No motifs could be observed in these regions but an analysis of amino acid types indicated differing patterns of enrichment and depletion that varied between taxa. Conclusions: Small training sets can be used effectively to train highly accurate and sensitive deep learning models without need for the operator to know anything other than sequence and without arbitrary decisions made about what sequence features or physico-chemical properties are important. Biological insight on subsequences important for classification can be achieved by examining the activations in the model. © 2021, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Activation analysis 
650 0 4 |a AI 
650 0 4 |a Biological insight 
650 0 4 |a Chemical activation 
650 0 4 |a Classification (of information) 
650 0 4 |a Convolution 
650 0 4 |a Convolutional neural networks 
650 0 4 |a Deep learning 
650 0 4 |a Deep learning 
650 0 4 |a Detection software 
650 0 4 |a Effector protein 
650 0 4 |a End effectors 
650 0 4 |a Food supply 
650 0 4 |a Global food security 
650 0 4 |a Learning classifiers 
650 0 4 |a Learning systems 
650 0 4 |a Long short-term memory 
650 0 4 |a Model architecture 
650 0 4 |a Neural Networks, Computer 
650 0 4 |a Personnel training 
650 0 4 |a plant protein 
650 0 4 |a Plant Proteins 
650 0 4 |a Protein Classification 
650 0 4 |a Proteins 
650 0 4 |a Secreted protein 
650 0 4 |a Sequence features 
650 0 4 |a software 
650 0 4 |a Software 
650 0 4 |a Software testing 
700 1 |a Kristianingsih, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a MacLean, D.  |e author 
773 |t BMC Bioinformatics