A workflow to identify novel proteins based on the direct mapping of peptide-spectrum-matches to genomic locations

• Main Authors: Anders, J. (Author), Haange, S.-B (Author), Jehmlich, N. (Author), Petruschke, H. (Author), Stadler, P.F (Author), von Bergen, M. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BioMed Central Ltd 2021
• Subjects: Bacterial community; Genes; genetics; Genome annotation; Genomic locations; genomics; Genomics; Hypothetical protein; Metaproteogenomics; Microbial communitities; open reading frame; Open reading frame; Open Reading Frames; peptide; Peptides; Peptide-spectrum matches; Potential sources; protein; Proteins; proteomics; Proteomics; Quality information; Small proteins; Transcriptomics; workflow; Workflow
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Background: Small Proteins have received increasing attention in recent years. They have in particular been implicated as signals contributing to the coordination of bacterial communities. In genome annotations they are often missing or hidden among large numbers of hypothetical proteins because genome annotation pipelines often exclude short open reading frames or over-predict hypothetical proteins based on simple models. The validation of novel proteins, and in particular of small proteins (sProteins), therefore requires additional evidence. Proteogenomics is considered the gold standard for this purpose. It extends beyond established annotations and includes all possible open reading frames (ORFs) as potential sources of peptides, thus allowing the discovery of novel, unannotated proteins. Typically this results in large numbers of putative novel small proteins fraught with large fractions of false-positive predictions. Results: We observe that number and quality of the peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) that map to a candidate ORF can be highly informative for the purpose of distinguishing proteins from spurious ORF annotations. We report here on a workflow that aggregates PSM quality information and local context into simple descriptors and reliably separates likely proteins from the large pool of false-positive, i.e., most likely untranslated ORFs. We investigated the artificial gut microbiome model SIHUMIx, comprising eight different species, for which we validate 5114 proteins that have previously been annotated only as hypothetical ORFs. In addition, we identified 37 non-annotated protein candidates for which we found evidence at the proteomic and transcriptomic level. Half (19) of these candidates have close functional homologs in other species. Another 12 candidates have homologs designated as hypothetical proteins in other species. The remaining six candidates are short (< 100 AA) and are most likely bona fide novel proteins. Conclusions: The aggregation of PSM quality information for predicted ORFs provides a robust and efficient method to identify novel proteins in proteomics data. The workflow is in particular capable of identifying small proteins and frameshift variants. Since PSMs are explicitly mapped to genomic locations, it furthermore facilitates the integration of transcriptomics data and other sources of genome-level information. © 2021, The Author(s).