|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03584nam a2200661Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1186-s12859-021-03969-0 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 14712105 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a CHICKN: extraction of peptide chromatographic elution profiles from large scale mass spectrometry data by means of Wasserstein compressive hierarchical cluster analysis
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b BioMed Central Ltd
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-03969-0
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Background: The clustering of data produced by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry analyses (LC-MS data) has recently gained interest to extract meaningful chemical or biological patterns. However, recent instrumental pipelines deliver data which size, dimensionality and expected number of clusters are too large to be processed by classical machine learning algorithms, so that most of the state-of-the-art relies on single pass linkage-based algorithms. Results: We propose a clustering algorithm that solves the powerful but computationally demanding kernel k-means objective function in a scalable way. As a result, it can process LC-MS data in an acceptable time on a multicore machine. To do so, we combine three essential features: a compressive data representation, Nyström approximation and a hierarchical strategy. In addition, we propose new kernels based on optimal transport, which interprets as intuitive similarity measures between chromatographic elution profiles. Conclusions: Our method, referred to as CHICKN, is evaluated on proteomics data produced in our lab, as well as on benchmark data coming from the literature. From a computational viewpoint, it is particularly efficient on raw LC-MS data. From a data analysis viewpoint, it provides clusters which differ from those resulting from state-of-the-art methods, while achieving similar performances. This highlights the complementarity of differently principle algorithms to extract the best from complex LC-MS data. © 2021, The Author(s).
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a algorithm
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Algorithms
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a chemistry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Chromatography, Liquid
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cluster analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cluster Analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Data Compression
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Data mining
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Data representations
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Essential features
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hierarchical clustering
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hierarchical strategies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hierarchical systems
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a information processing
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a K-means clustering
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Large-scale cluster analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Learning algorithms
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a liquid chromatography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Liquid chromatography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Liquid chromatography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Machine learning
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a mass spectrometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Mass spectrometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Mass spectrometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Mass Spectrometry
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Mass spectrometry analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Mass spectrometry data
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Multi-core machines
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Objective functions
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Optimal transport
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a peptide
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Peptides
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a proteomics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Proteomics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Proteomics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Proteomics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a State-of-the-art methods
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Wasserstein kernel
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Burger, T.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fortin, T.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Guibert, R.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hesse, A.-M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kraut, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Permiakova, O.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t BMC Bioinformatics
|