Shelving Issues: Patrolling the Boundaries of Democratic Discussion in Public Meetings

Democratic participation is widely viewed as a crucial underpinning of legitimate governance; however, little is known about how this participation is practically accomplished. This study contributes to a better understanding of what democratic citizenship encompasses in actual practices of public e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: te Molder, H. (Author), van Burgsteden, L. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Inc. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02292nam a2200385Ia 4500
001 10.1177-0261927X221079615
008 220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 0261927X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Shelving Issues: Patrolling the Boundaries of Democratic Discussion in Public Meetings 
260 0 |b SAGE Publications Inc.  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221079615 
520 3 |a Democratic participation is widely viewed as a crucial underpinning of legitimate governance; however, little is known about how this participation is practically accomplished. This study contributes to a better understanding of what democratic citizenship encompasses in actual practices of public engagement. Using conversation analysis and discursive psychology, we analyze interactions between government officials and citizens in Dutch public meetings on the effects of livestock farming. We examine situations where citizens treat officials’ closing-implicative moves as “wanting to shelve” issues. We demonstrate how this uptake is preceded by officials treating citizens as not understanding what is within the scope of discussion, thereby challenging their democratic competence. Citizens subsequently turn the tables on the officials, treating them as not wanting to fulfill their democratic duties. We argue that these practices point to broader relational issues between government and citizens, transforming what seem mere agenda issues into negotiations about what constitutes good democracy. © The Author(s) 2022. 
650 0 4 |a agricultural worker 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a citizenship 
650 0 4 |a conversation 
650 0 4 |a conversation analysis 
650 0 4 |a democracy 
650 0 4 |a democratic competence 
650 0 4 |a discursive psychology 
650 0 4 |a gatekeeping 
650 0 4 |a government 
650 0 4 |a government employee 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a livestock 
650 0 4 |a negotiation 
650 0 4 |a nonhuman 
650 0 4 |a ordinary democracy 
650 0 4 |a patient referral 
650 0 4 |a psychology 
650 0 4 |a public meetings 
650 0 4 |a topic or sequence closure 
700 1 |a te Molder, H.  |e author 
700 1 |a van Burgsteden, L.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Language and Social Psychology