The relationship between polychronicity and social networks: A mixed-methods study of research and development professionals

How do knowledge workers interact with their colleagues when organizations increasingly ask them to work on multiple activities, projects and working spheres simultaneously? Given the importance of social networks for individual and organizational success, in this study we explore the relationship b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bertolotti, F. (Author), Dukerich, J. (Author), Mattarelli, E. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications Ltd 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02429nam a2200289Ia 4500
001 10.1177-0018726718810097
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00187267 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The relationship between polychronicity and social networks: A mixed-methods study of research and development professionals 
260 0 |b SAGE Publications Ltd  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718810097 
520 3 |a How do knowledge workers interact with their colleagues when organizations increasingly ask them to work on multiple activities, projects and working spheres simultaneously? Given the importance of social networks for individual and organizational success, in this study we explore the relationship between individual preferences for engaging in multiple tasks simultaneously (individual polychronicity), the perception of the organization’s demands in terms of engaging in multiple tasks simultaneously (organizational polychronicity), and centrality in instrumental networks. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, we collected data from knowledge professionals in a research and development (R&D) unit. Our results show that both individual and organizational polychronicity were related to network centrality. However, the effect of individual polychronicity on instrumental network centrality was stronger, especially for advice-related interactions, suggesting that individual preferences matter more when it comes to knowledge-related interactions. Not only do we link polychronicity to a previously unexplored context, that is, social networks, but we also propose the use of a cultural toolkit perspective to explain how individuals differentially make sense of organizational temporal demands. Finally, we advance research on the antecedents of network centrality and contribute to the ongoing debate on the delicate balance between structure and individual characteristics. © The Author(s) 2018. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a agency 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a centrality 
650 0 4 |a cultural toolkit 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a individual polychronicity 
650 0 4 |a instrumental social networks 
650 0 4 |a organizational polychronicity 
650 0 4 |a perception 
650 0 4 |a social network 
700 1 |a Bertolotti, F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Dukerich, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mattarelli, E.  |e author 
773 |t Human Relations