Noise-dose estimated with and without pre-cochlear amplification

Amplification from natural ear canal resonance has been documented as highly variable across individuals. However, individual variability in total pre-cochlear amplification (i.e., combined external and middle ear mechanisms) remains understudied in relevance to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). It...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grinn, S.K (Author), Le Prell, C.G (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Acoustical Society of America 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02806nam a2200313Ia 4500
001 10.1121-1.5132546
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00014966 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Noise-dose estimated with and without pre-cochlear amplification 
260 0 |b Acoustical Society of America  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5132546 
520 3 |a Amplification from natural ear canal resonance has been documented as highly variable across individuals. However, individual variability in total pre-cochlear amplification (i.e., combined external and middle ear mechanisms) remains understudied in relevance to noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). It is well-known that more noise means more risk of hearing loss, yet the current risk-models do not consider individually variable pre-cochlear amplification, also referred to as the transfer function of the open ear (TFOE). The present study principally documented individual TFOE variability and explored the feasibility and accuracy of simple proxy metrics, which could be used to estimate TFOE. Participants' TFOE values were used to estimate their NIHL risk in hypothetical free-field exposures. Forty-eight adult participants (42 female, 6 male, ages 21-60 years) met inclusion criteria of 2 healthy pinnae and ear canals (<10% cerumen occlusion) and type-A tympanometric examination. Participants underwent otoscopy, tympanometry, pinna size measurement, real-ear-to-coupler-difference, and TFOE measurement. TFOE ranged from 5 to 15 dB-A (mean = 10 dB-A); given that NIHL risk is estimated to double in either 3 or 5 dB-A increments, the observed variability could explain a substantial portion of individual vulnerability to NIHL. A simple regression model with eardrum compliance (ml) was correlated with individual TFOE (p < 0.05). TFOE variability has the potential to substantially explain why two individuals with the same noise-exposure can develop significantly different degrees of NIHL. Eardrum compliance (ml) was a correlated proxy measurement of TFOE in this principally adult, female dataset; additional research is needed to confirm this relationship in a unique, heterogeneous dataset. © 2019 Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Audition 
650 0 4 |a Canals 
650 0 4 |a Cochlear amplification 
650 0 4 |a Ear canal resonances 
650 0 4 |a Individual variability 
650 0 4 |a Middle ear mechanisms 
650 0 4 |a Noise exposure 
650 0 4 |a Noise induced hearing loss 
650 0 4 |a Noise pollution 
650 0 4 |a Regression analysis 
650 0 4 |a Regression model 
650 0 4 |a Risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a Risk perception 
650 0 4 |a Size measurements 
700 1 |a Grinn, S.K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Le Prell, C.G.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of the Acoustical Society of America