Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study

• Main Authors: Elhaddad, A.A (Author), ELsyad, M.A (Author), Khirallah, A.S (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Blackwell Publishing Inc. 2018
• Subjects: dental abutment; Dental Abutments; Dental Implant-Abutment Design; Dental Models; dental procedure; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Stress Analysis; denture; Denture Retention; Denture, Overlay; devices; human; Humans; implant; implant-supported denture; in vitro study; In Vitro Techniques; Locator; maxilla; Maxilla; O-ring; overdentures; overlay denture; procedures; Retention
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Purpose: To evaluate and compare retentive properties of O-ring and Locator attachments for implant-retained maxillary overdentures. Materials and Methods: Four implant analogs were inserted in canine and second premolar areas of an acrylic edentulous maxillary model. A metal-reinforced experimental acrylic overdenture was constructed and connected to the analogs using either O-ring (group I) or Locator (group II) attachments. Locators were divided into 3 subgroups according the degree of retention of the patrix nylon insert: Locator extra-light retention (group IIa), Locator light retention (group IIb), and Locator medium retention (group IIc). Vertical and oblique (lateral, anterior, and posterior) dislodging forces were measured at the beginning of the study (initial retention) and after 540 cycles of denture insertion and removal (final retention). Results: For vertical, lateral, and anterior dislodging, group IIc recorded the highest initial and final retention, and group I recorded the lowest retention. For posterior dislodging, group I recorded the highest retention, and group IIa recorded the lowest retention. For group II, vertical dislodging recorded the highest initial and final retention, and lateral dislodging recorded the lowest retention. For group I, posterior dislodging recorded the highest initial and final retention, and lateral dislodging recorded the lowest retention. For all dislodging forces (except posterior dislodging), the highest retention loss was recorded in group I, and the lowest retention loss was recorded in group IIa. Conclusion: Locator medium attachment was associated with favorable retention during axial (vertical) and nonaxial (anterior and lateral) dislodging compared to other types of Locator inserts and O-ring attachments after a simulated 6-month period of overdenture use. © 2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists